Free Trade and Burpees
I’m bothered
that people don’t see trade the same way I do. Despite the fact that trade is
highly multidimensional, people still focus on just one part – the trade
deficit in goods. The trade deficit in goods is the telling figure to most
people. We import more goods than we export. So there must be something wrong
with us. Furthermore they equate years of decline in manufacturing employment
with this surplus of imports. It sounds simple. We buy stuff from China instead
of America and therefore we have a trade deficit and employment contracts in
the USA.
But simple
things are sometimes not so simple.
First, an
analogy. Ashley tells Jason he should exercise more. It’s good for you, she
says. So Jason starts a new exercise routine. Hey Ashley he says, my arms and
legs hurt. They are killing me. Keep exercising she says, it will help your
whole body. You will thank me later.
The pains of
free trade are quick and obvious. To those displaced or diminished, their
plights are not to be minimized or ignored. They must be assisted. But that is
an issue separate from whether or not we should incur the pain. Some people
say, no pain no gain. Maybe that is extreme. But ask any Olympic athlete and
they can tell you how many hours and Ibuprofen it took to master their sport.
Ask any musician how easy it was to learn how to make nice music.
With
international trade we see the obvious hardships the nation must incur today.
But the benefits are gradual in coming, diffused and much more difficult to
see. Exercise does not make you jump 17 feet over a bar today – but it does
help you be stronger and more flexible as you age.
Still, you
might wonder whether the US benefits from trade. Consider this. Our population
is 324 million people. The world’s population is 7.4 billion. There are lot of
wants and needs residing outside of the US. And those needs are growing. World per capital income (according to the World Bank) rose from $500
per person in 1960 to $10,000 in 2015.
The average American made more than 5
times what the average world citizen made in 2015. World GDP
rose by $72 trillion from 1960 to 2015. In comparison, US GDP rose by less than
$18 trillion. POINT – the rest of the world has a lot of catching up to reach
the US standard of living – and as they do their incomes will rise by huge
amounts. They may not be there yet, but we definitely want to position
ourselves to take advantage of rising world wealth. Being hostile to foreign
business is not a great way to do that.
Finally
let’s look at some trade data. Today I focus on the real values of goods
exports and imports. This leaves out services because they are in surplus.
These measures also eliminate prices and focus on the quantity of goods coming
in and out of the country. I looked at the annual data since 1967. The numbers
are percentage changes. Data can be found at bea.gov.
· Of the 48 years between 1967 and
2015, in 22 of those years US exports grew faster than imports. In 26 years
imports grew faster exports.
· Goods imports annual percentage change
exceeded goods exports sporadically (1968, 1969, 1971, 1972, 1976, 1977), from 1981 to 1986, from 1992 to 1994, 1996, and 1998 to 2004, 2010, 2014, 2015.
· In all the remaining years, exports
of goods annual percentage change exceeded import change. More recently exports
growth from the US exceeded import growth from 2005 to through 2013.
· This is not the picture of a
uniformly declining competitiveness of the USA because of globalization. In
fact 12 of the 26 years when imports were rising faster than exports were
before globalization picked up in the early 1990s.
· In 2004 exports of goods trailed
imports – with exports just over 50% of the value of all imports. By 2013 the
ratio had increased to about 70%.
It is true that the US has a large goods trade deficit with the
rest of world and especially with China. It is also true that this deficit has
widened in value terms. But if we focus on real values we see a comeback with
exports of goods growing faster than imports. This in no way proves that
all is good and fair in international trade. But as the world regains its
momentum and the rest of the world stabilizes and begins to catch up with US
growth, we should expect them to want even more US goods. Shutting their goods
out of US markets will do little to promote their desires to buy from the US. One more point.
We should expect that many countries would
become stronger competitors to the US once they recovered from World War II
damages. We should expect as well that many countries would compete against the
US after the massive reforms that occurred worldwide after the collapse of the
Soviet Union and dictatorships in South America. We can’t stop any of that and
it would silly to try to do so. This tsunami of competition would have occurred
with or without free trade agreements. We can argue about unfair trade but the
truth is that America is being tested. We can complain about the competitors or
we can get busy in figuring out the best way to remain strong in this new world. Withdrawing from the global stage seems counterproductive.
Explain this to my son who can't get a good enough job to live on his own.
ReplyDeleteI already did. Tell him to read my blog. The rest is your problem.
DeleteExplain this to my son who can't get a good enough job to support himself.
ReplyDeleteMy business is in the "make it in Asia" and sell it in the US. There is no way to make it in the US and sell it here with the buying alternative being Asia for our customers and our competitors. However, The government cleverly classifies us a a process manufacturer and does not count the Asian made goods as a finished product. I am sure there a lot of others like this and it distorts the statistics. Alternatively, we can make it is Asia and sell it there through a JV partner which works fine if we can control the partner...yes Asia is rapidly catching up.
ReplyDeleteWe employ 18 people but use a high level of IT to fill in for the other jobs. We also provide service.
My question is where are those jobs? The US job market needs have shifted dramatically since many of the products are made in Asia. But the supply of people educated to take those jobs is growing much slower.
Nobody said these transitions would be fast or painless. It takes time to register that the X jobs are disappearing and the Y jobs are available. A lot has to change in education and training to facilitate the transitions. In the meantime it is not easy to find IT workers. If it helps any, one of the fastest growing majors at IU is called Informatics -- a marriage of convenience between technology science and technology use.
DeleteOver the years, we in the US have come to believe that people will automatically flock to our products because for so many years, they did. I remember when I used to check out the toys at Elmore's 5&10, and if the sticker on the bottom said "Made in Japan," I put it back. That mindset has stayed with us too long, and we aren't willing to accept that perhaps products just as good or better are made overseas, and they are usually less expensive. Lets not get into labor costs which is a whole 'nother argument but an important part of this one, really. Of course, when we are in such debt to one or two other countries, it doesn't help to do anything to protect our own business. We might just anger our debt holders.
ReplyDeleteSounds like Jason needs to pop Ashley in the kisser and go have another beer and a bag of Cheetos.
Ash, Please do not encourage intra-household fistacuffs. Although a bag of Cheetos does sound good. I think you have the debt thing backwards. We are lucky they hold our debt. We should kiss them for holding our debt. The only way they can hurt us by selling our debt is if the debt is perceived to be junk by everyone. That's the part that needs emphasizing. Our reps in Washington seem to ignore the damage they are doing to our debt. They are the problem. Not the countries who are stupid enough to trust our debt.
Delete