Bloomberg.com
had an article last week with a photo of a smiling Janet Yellen which said that
the Fed was elated that the inflation rate was rising in the US. On the same
day was an article “The Fed Embraces a More Diverse Future” that had several
quotes from Fed officials decrying disparate effects of unemployment on
minorities. Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari promised to “spend a day in
the life of a struggling black family in order to better understand that
experience.” The article concluded
“While
the Fed may have no direct ability to do anything about this relationship, it
may be less willing to call an overall unemployment rate of 4.5 to 5 percent
full employment if it coincides with a black unemployment rate of 8.5 to 9
percent.”
I
wanted to know more about the explicit goals of the Fed. I found the below words at a Federal Reserve website https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/money_12848.htm
The
Congress established the statutory objectives for monetary policy--maximum
employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates--in the
Federal Reserve Act. In
setting monetary policy, the Committee seeks to mitigate deviations of
inflation from its longer-run goal and deviations of employment from the
Committee's assessments of its maximum level. These objectives are generally
complementary. However, under circumstances in which the Committee judges that
the objectives are not complementary, it follows a balanced approach in
promoting them, taking into account the magnitude of the deviations and the
potentially different time horizons over which employment and inflation are
projected to return to levels judged consistent with its mandate.
Wow.
Double Wow. The Fed’s explicit job is to control inflation and employment. Yet
today’s Fed officials are happy to see more inflation and are not content when
they reach their goal of full employment.
Interesting
is how cavalier the Fed is departing from its statutory mission. I can see
it now. Hey coach I think I would be more popular if I played guard on our
football team. But son, you are a quarterback. Come on coach, the linemen are
cool guys and I always wanted to hang with the cool guys.
The Fed
has no mission and has no ability to affect the composition of unemployment. If
they drive the unemployment rate below the usual definition of full employment
– they can provide some jobs for those at the lower end of the labor pool. But
history shows that such jobs do not last very long. Driving unemployment so low
will cause the economy to run fast enough to absorb more workers. But like any
engine that runs faster than normal for a while – it will generate frictions
that eventually bring it back to normal – if not requiring a new engine!
History suggests also that the aftermath of such reckless driving is often the
dreaded scourge stagflation wherein both inflation and unemployment rise
together. At some point the Fed then has to tighten and cause a recession and
even more unemployment. Thus gains are not only temporary but they end up worsening the entire economy.
As for
the seemingly perverse joy over a September rise in the inflation rate, this
just underscores my point. Yellen has recently been quoted as saying it would be okay
for the economy to run hot for a while. I like my coffee hot but she is
delusional if she thinks a hot economy is a good thing. Higher inflation and a
hot economy won't accomplish anything except to raise and then dash the
expectations and lives of those least able to deal with such changes.
Unfortunately
our current Fed has fallen for the liberal line that one should focus on the
short-run. Despite relying on nothing more than dreams and drugs, our Fed wants
to make people feel happy that it is doing something. But like many
do-gooders, the Fed has neither the tools nor the mission. Just because
Congress is broken it does not mean the Fed can pull a rabbit out of a hat. Unequal incomes may be a problem but like the QB who wants to be an offensive lineman, the Fed is neither qualified nor licensed to solve this problem. Mrs Yellen -- please just stick to your job description.
UHU! I always wanted to be a cheerleader...maybe date one but did not have the finesse. Can we not have more of a ealistic economy where creating jobs in the form of more regulations and agencies is really not creating new jobs. The unemployment rate is a very loose measure of the real employment and the wages they are paid versus what inflation would bring us.
ReplyDeleteIf you had paid attention in school when you learned about IS as well as LM, you would know that a nice dose of inflation would help with job creation. Some other poor fool would be around to clean up the mess later.
ReplyDeleteMore importantly, a good does of inflation would reduce the cost of floating the national debt. Disguised taxes are much loved.
Dear Roger, If I had paid attention in school I would have gotten out a lot sooner. The IS-LM model went out with 8 track players and pink khaki pants but I get your drift about more inflation insidiously robbing folks at a later time. I think we called that stagflation back in the 70s.
DeleteLaughing at you gentlemen while thoughts of conspiracy float through my mind. A quick fix makes people feel warm and cozy right now. What else matters? #playingkickthecan
ReplyDeleteThanks Jaden, Laughing is always good for the soul! If a quick fix is kicking the can down the road, then at some point you run out of road...or cans. :-)
Delete