As the US
refocuses on the impacts of international trade through the lenses of many
trade agreements, it doesn’t hurt to consider from where our competitors are
coming. The US wants to reduce, for example, its trade deficit with China. To
do that, either China will have to buy more of our goods or we will have to buy
less of theirs.
Today I want
to focus on US exports of goods to China and the rest of the world. I am
ignoring services exports because we have a surplus in our trade with services.
Our trade problem seems to reside in goods. The IMF keeps some good statistics
on goods trade, and their best database has some nice detail for the years 2013
to 2017. That’s five years – a long enough time for my buddy Nolan to reach his
current age of 5 and long enough to draw some conclusions. My main conclusion is
that if the US wants to raise its exports, it is not going to be easy.
The table below
contains some relevant data on exports of goods. We see that in 2013, the world
exported goods whose value in dollars was a bit more than $18 trillion. Since that
time, goods exports did not increase; rather, they fell to a level of $17.7 trillion
in 2017. The appetite for goods exports has clearly not grown. It fell by
almost half a trillion dollars. Let’s agree that with a shrinking pie and a lot
of eager-beaver countries, it won’t be easy to expand US exports of goods.
Comparing
the next two lines, we see that as of 2017, advanced nations were selling only a
bit more than the sum of all emerging nations. It was about a 60/40 split in
2017, and that split reflects the very strong desire of emerging markets to grow
through exports of goods. Advanced nations will not give in easily so the
future portends a time wherein both advanced and emerging nations will want to
compete with the US to supply the world’s demand for goods.
The
countries I chose to compare were based on foods that I love. I also chose ones
that are major exporting countries and some with which the US might have a
special trade relationship. Notice that with the exceptions of China, Mexico, and South Korea, all these countries shared the experiences of declining goods exports from 2013
to 2017. I am guessing that all those countries will try to do the same thing we
are trying to do in the US – find a way to export more.
China’s
exports increased between 2013 and 2017. China represented about 12% of the
world’s exports in 2013. China was the largest country exporter. But notice
even China can’t be too happy with its $67 billion increase in exports between
2013 and 2017. That represented a 3% increase in four years or less than 1% growth per
year. Mexico’s was larger at 8% over four years or 2% per year. South Korea's increase was less than 4% per year. Those
performances are nothing to brag about at the bar at Tacos Guaymas Mexican
Restaurant. So even China, Mexico, and South Korea will not relent in their goals to produce and sell goods to the world.
In 2013, the
US was the world’s second largest goods exporter and we claimed 9% of the
worlds exports of goods. That’s not bad. But as I have said before, our problem
with goods trade is not production or exporting. Our problem is our voracious
appetite for buying goods.
Data source: http://data.imf.org/?sk=388DFA60-1D26-4ADE-B505-A05A558D9A42
Goods Exports of Selected Areas | ||||
2013 to 2017, in billions of dollars | ||||
Source: imf.org: | ||||
2013 | 2017 | % of World | Change | |
2013 | 2013 to 2017 | |||
World | 18,193 | 17,702 | 100 | -491 |
Advanced Nations | 10,685 | 10,171 | 59 | -514 |
Emerging Markets | 7,509 | 7,136 | 41 | -373 |
China | 2,210 | 2,277 | 12 | 67 |
United States | 1,579 | 1,547 | 9 | -32 |
Germany | 1,451 | 1,441 | 8 | -10 |
Japan | 714 | 687 | 4 | -27 |
S. Korea | 560 | 574 | 3 | 14 |
Russia | 522 | 353 | 3 | -169 |
Canada | 465 | 424 | 3 | -41 |
Mexico | 380 | 410 | 2 | 30 |
India | 314 | 299 | 2 | -15 |
With China's population being about 4X the US, the above difference would suggest worrying about the above trade imbalance in goods is sort of meaningless.In fact, as 21st Century develops, I would think the contribution of goods trade would continue to fall for US.
ReplyDeleteGood point Ed. But politicians won't give up try to slow the process. As the Physiocrats clung to Agriculture, we cling to manufacturing. At some point a rich prosperous nation adept at producing high valued added goods and services might look forward rather than backwards.
DeleteSomewhat connected to this issue is the US need to update our approach to Intellectual Property, first on our own turf and then on the world stage. Patent protection is reasonably strong but has been hurt by the watering down of the need to "practice the art" oneself rather than simply to use the patent right to hold up the market place. The other conventions, copyright, trademark/dress, and trade secret, are too weak for the 21st century digital marketplace to have much long term international value.
ReplyDeleteWell said. I don't think I have much to add. But if one's intellectual property cannot be safe-guarded then I wonder what impact that has on future innovation. Why spend all the money developing something new if it can be stolen in a heartbeat?
Delete