In
our justified pride for extending life, we should remember the other side of
the wealth-health equation. Nearly as important as the extra life gained
from spending innovation dollars may be the enormous increase in wealth that
resulted from living longer. With the exception of Bill Gates, Mark
Zuckerberg, LaBron James and a few European soccer stars, most wealth is owned
by old people and for one very practical reason: compound interest and ROI (rate of return on investment).
It takes a long time for a $100 sitting in an index fund or savings
account to grow to $1B but because we are living to archeological ages, we can
be patient. Average life expectancy for males in the US in 1900 was about
47 years (1). That’s not much time to build a fortune considering we
don’t walk for a full year and grad school can eat up 10% of the total. We now
have almost too many billionaires to count and not just in China.
Back
to healthcare, people are beginning to complain that hospital and CVS bills now
consume 18% of GDP. America’s health bill in 2018 was $3T (yes, trillion)
(3). Even if that seems like a lot, imagine a country being able to fork
over that amount and still be under 20% of GDP. The US can and does spend
more each year on healthcare than the total GDP of Great Britain, France, Italy
or Brazil. (4)
Let’s
raise our glass to the capital appreciation Americans will enjoy in 2020 just
by making it to the end of the year. It’s nice to know that almost a
fifth of the total will support continued exploration, validation and adoption
of new cures and therapies, and contribute to a virtuous wealth and health
cycle. Space prevents examining the “America spends the most for only
average health outcomes” red herring which always seems to follow conversations
about healthcare costs.
Bruce
Gingles is vice-president of Healthcare Policy and a 40 year employee of Cook
Medical.
Professor Doober: Your guest blogger forgot to say that (1) life expectancy is now dropping in the US; (2) the US medical system does very poorly in quality metrics compared to other countries; and (3) the US medical system is, by far, more expensive than other countries
ReplyDeleteThanks J. I can't speak for him but I can say that his goal might be to not repeat what many have said many times but to shine a different light on that system. Perhaps he is saying that the situation is not all bad. Some folks would throw out the baby with the dirty bath water. One should recognize that the baby has value too. I think he does us a service by completing a partial picture.
DeleteProfessor Doober: I would agree, as long as folks do not see the American health care system as a panacea. At the risk of generalizing: the left think it is all bad while the right thinks it is wonderful. Clearly we are somewhere in between. Your guest blogger did not make note of that.
DeleteJ. (and good guess as to my identity LOL)
As a writer yourself yoo understand that not every message has to be a full treatise on a topic. He has the right to focus on one aspect -- one aspect that he thinks might be under-understood. I think he did a great job of that. As you know when it comes to academic journals, they are always looking for that one kernal of new information.
Delete