As my loyal
followers might recall, some of my posts are a tad more educational than
others. Those of you who have degrees in silly things like fine arts and
biology often appreciate my patient and vainglorious attempts to make every day
complicated economic concepts even more complicated. If you look back among the
9,763 stories I have posted in the last 217 years you will see 11 such
insightful JD motivated dramas. Today is #12.
Balance of
payments is one of those sad macroeconomic indicators that MSW grads from
Harvard know nothing about. If you asked all the remaining presidential
candidates what BOP means they would probably guess it is the name of a dance
invented by Bill Haley and the Comets. So I have chosen a wonderful topic for
today’s blog and I want you to know that a test will follow.
BOP is a
pretty optimistic and archaic name for data that attempts to record all
cross-border or international transactions. Wow – what a goal – to record all
international transactions! So let’s start out with the very well-known fact
that BOP data are about as accurate as a CNBC presidential poll. The BOP data is a noble gesture but if you
think it is hard to measure how much your kid earned at her Lemonade Stand today,
then imagine trying to account for ALL cross border trades in goods, services,
stocks, bonds, bank accounts and what the Tuna would refer to as college boys
gone wild in Tijuana.
But they
try. I won’t defend the methods except to say that people who do this kind of
thing are vastly underpaid professionals and most of them care very much about
doing a good job. And who would bribe the guy in charge of measuring the exports
of Chevy hubcaps to Havana? These government workers are saints and deserve a
two-for one coupon at the Colonel Sanders Restaurant of their choice.
Before I get
into the nitty gritty, I want to say in all seriously (ha ha) that BOP is the
main event these days and helps us to understand things like economic growth,
interest rates and so on. For example, BOP changes should help us understand why the dollar rose by 20% last year. So don’t get lost in the trees – a forest of
delicious fruits will unfold if you stick with this. Your life will never be
the same.
Let’s start
with the easy stuff. Exports are the goods and services we ship to other
countries. In 2015 we shipped $2.2 trillion to our trading partners. Of course
we also bought that same kind of stuff from foreign countries and that amounted
to $2.7 trillion in 2015. If you music majors can do the math, that means that
we had a goods and services trade deficit of about $500 billion in 2015. I had
a reading deficit once and that was not pleasant. So you can imagine the anguish when a
lovely country like the US has a goods and services deficit of $500 billion.
But here is the cool part. This deficit means that there are $500 billion
dollars scattered across the world that didn’t want to buy US goods and
services. We sent them $2.7 billion but they only sent $2.2 billion back. Thus
they are holding $500 billion.
The suspense
builds. What did foreigners do with all that money? Probably the first thing
that comes to mind is to get rid of it. If you don’t want dollars – then you probably sell
the dollars for renminbi or yens or some other currency. If that was the only
outcome, then all that selling of dollars would probably cause the value of the
dollar to depreciate.
But
foreigners have other choices. They can use the dollars to invest in America.
In this case invest should be taken broadly meaning they can use the dollars
to open bank accounts, or buy stocks and
bonds, real estate, a US company or buy a famous US monument like Mount
Rushmore or Stone Mountain. If they do that instead of selling their dollars
then the dollar does not depreciate and instead the prices of financial assets
increase and/or interest rates decrease.
Back to the
BOP accounts in 2015. Something called the Current
Account measures exports, imports and a couple of other things. The
exact deficit in the current account in 2015 was $484 billion after being $390
billion in 2014. Thus in 2015 we left even more dollars around the world. But the Current Account is only half the fun. This brings us to what is called the Financial & Capital Account.
Here is what I learned about the F&C account in 2015. After adding $977
billion to their US assets in 2014, foreigners only invested another $426
billion in the US in 2015. That is quite a turnaround. If I stopped the story
there it would appear that in 2015 the dollar should have depreciated since
foreigners were not pouring their dollars into US exports or US assets. All that
would make the dollar sound pretty
unpopular.
But there is
one more part to the F&C Account. That part has to do with US investments
abroad. In 2014 US citizens added $792 billion to their foreign asset holdings.
In 2015 that number fell to $242 billion. US citizens were investing more at
home rather than abroad. Now put these two facts together – foreigners were
investing less in the USA and US citizens were investing less abroad. In a crazy uncertain world, money was
staying at home!
Cutting
through all the numbers – according to the Current Account $484 went out of the
USA for goods and services in 2015. According to the F&C account $209 billion came
back to the USA to buy financial stuff. Thus there are $275
billion unaccounted for in the usual transactions in the BOP. Where are those dollars and
what are they doing? Somehow they must be desired because during 2015 the value
of the dollar increased. I think most of us know that global tensions created a
healthy appetite for US dollars. But somehow BOP is not fully recording that
appetite.
Right now that
$275 billion is recorded in the F&C account as a “statistical discrepancy.”
Or in an accountant’s words—we have a
$275 billion fudge factor in our accounting. I am guessing that revised data will
show more foreigner investment in US assets. One likely suspect is governments who bought dollars in an attempt to depreciate their currencies. Otherwise the BOP data leave it very hard to explain a 20% rise in the value of the dollar in 2015.
No comments:
Post a Comment