I decided in retirement that I should become a scratch golfer. I am not sure what that means but it sounds good to combine playing golf with something fun like scratching. So I went to my friend Bob and he gave me one club – a nice driver that was in the corner of his garage. I dusted off the cobwebs and he looked at it fondly remarking that was all I needed. If I could master that wooden driver, I would become a scratch golfer. He then pointed me in the direction of a golf course.
Is any of the above true? Of course not. But it reminds me of what I am reading frequently about exchange rates. If Greece could just replace the euro with the drachma again all things would be okay. With the dollar rising against the euro, US pharmaceutical exports to the EU will be dramatically hurt. If China would just revalue the renminbi against the dollar, then the US would become a major exporter again. People who are saying these things should be smacked with a wooden driver. You can’t be a great golfer with one club and you can’t salvage a country’s economy by depreciating its currency.
How can I make fun of exchange rate wisdom? Is it wrong? Actually it isn’t technically wrong but it clearly suffers from either wishful or overly simplistic thinking. Let’s suppose that Jose lives in Paris and he really loves French wine. If the value of the dollar falls, will Jose stop drinking French wine and buy a couple of cases of Mogen David? Probably not.
So what’s this exchange rate idea all about? It begins with the idea that some goods are highly tradable across country borders. To some people, a bottle of merlot is a bottle of merlot. They don’t care where it got produced. They walk up and down the wine store aisle talking to themselves until they finally make a choice. To many people, the beauty of the label might be the deciding factor. To others, the price makes a big difference. So if the French wine costs $12 and the California wine of roughly equivalent quality and label beauty costs $10, then this time they buy the local USA product.
So where does the exchange rate come in? The US wine’s price of $10 (from our example) will be determined mostly by domestic factors in the USA – cost of grapes, labor, etc. The dollar price of the French wine sold in Kroger in Bloomington Indiana (the $12 in the example) is based on two things – (1) the cost of the wine bottle in France in euros (mostly determined by local French wages, cost of grapes, etc) and (2) the euro/dollar exchange rate. Putting this all together, the decision to buy the French or the US wine depends on three things:
1. The price of the USA wine in dollars
2. The price of the French wine in euros
3. The euro/dollar exchange rate
This little story helps to understand one thing – the exchange rate is only one of several factors that might impact international trade. For example, let’s suppose Greece has a drachma and suppose they let the value of the drachma depreciate. Would that help Greece sell more exports to the world? On the surface it seems it would. If nothing else changed, that would make Greek goods and services less expensive to consumers living in Europe, America, and the rest of the world. Cool. But as some of my intelligent friends are used to saying – “ceteris aint paribus”. Which is another way of saying that too many people have PhDs – and another way of saying that not everything stays constant.
For example, one reason the drachma might be depreciating today is because local conditions yesterday in Greece made Greek goods very uncompetitive. Thus the drachma price of goods might be very high in Greece. Sure, the depreciation of the drachma might help restore Greek competitiveness, but it might not fall enough to make a person in France want to buy the Greek wine over the more efficiently produced French variety. Or…suppose the drachma depreciates and people begin to buy more Greek wine. How might French wineries react to this? If they don’t want to lose business they might react competitively and reduce the price of French wine. That would make Greek wine less desirable and would reduce Greek exports.
Putting with a wooden driver isn’t very smart if you have some other clubs in your bag. Depreciating a currency might not be enough to improve your exports if international trade also depends on prices of goods and services at home and all over the world.
I wish that was the end of the story since it is getting close to the time of my daily afternoon nap. But let me just say a little more. Let me pull out my nine iron. J LOL…Anyway, there’s more to the story. Let’s suppose the drachma depreciates – how does that affect all those Greek companies that buy materials and resources from other countries? The weaker drachma makes everything these companies buy from abroad more expensive. So if these companies pass along these increased costs into their goods, then it causes more inflation in Greece and makes their goods less competitive globally. Surely this is not good for Greek exports. Finally, if the drachma depreciates, think about what happens to foreign companies who produce goods in Greece. Those companies regularly convert their drachma profits back to the currencies of their home countries. When they do, the depreciated drachma makes their earnings in home currency smaller. Yikes, the profits of a Greek location look worse compared to producing in Latvia or Croatia. What happens if these companies pull up stakes and do their production and exporting in other countries?
Okay – so hopefully I made my point. You wouldn’t go golfing with one club – so please don’t listen to these snake-oil salesmen who want you to believe that a simple appreciation/depreciation of some currency is going to solve all our problems.
However, when China pegs its RNB to 1:7 of the US dollar is it artificially creating its own market in the US and avoiding importing any US goods unless they are so special that the people will pay for them? On the other hand, if a US company establishes a plant in China to export back to the US they are products made at Chinese cost (1:7) and what ever they can buy raw materials for. They can also export back to the US tariff free or reduced. Lastly, the flow of currency exchange is somewhat retarded when China own a large share of US Treasury Notes. The question is"what were or are the good and bad things created by this inequity?"
ReplyDeleteJim,
ReplyDeletePegging is a whole other topic but your questions still fit into what I was saying in my posting. If China can keep its currency value low, it can boost its exports and trade surplus. But notice that China worries a lot about its inflation rate. One reason it worries is that it knows that higher inflation could erode its competitive position. It is not just the exchange rate -- relative prices matter too. Second, you raise a good topic that I did not cover in my post. Exchange rates are very sensitive to financial and capital flows. While a country might want a lower exchange rate for the purposes of goods and services trade, there might be things happening in financial trades that lead to changes in exchange values. For example, the US often experiences capital inflows that raise the value of the dollar -- high enough to cause concern about exports and trade deficits. I wrote almost two pages in my post. Two pages in clearly not enough to cover everything that could be said. Thanks for your comments...
Hi Larry,
ReplyDeletePart of the problem I see with classical macro is new developments. Not to say that your analysis of a devalued drachma does not increase the cost of foreign sourced raw materials. Just that GE was able to pay zero taxes in the US in 2009 because it posted its profits in its foreign based companies. I am sure they were also able to buy raw materials at the best possible prices.
GE is not alone in doing this. This link illustrates just how little national borders can mean, not to mention the blow back from tax payers when their taxes go to multi nationals from foreign countries.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/37976.html
Is there some macro theory, or plans to develop one, about how multinationals can circumvent currency exchange rates with book keeping tricks and inter-company funds transfers?
Tom,
ReplyDeleteYou added two comments last night and despite approving them both several times, only one of them shows up above. So I am going to paste your comment below in my comment -- and then try to answer both of your comments. Sometimes this blogspot is not very friendly! :-(
Here is your other comment: Several blog entries ago you posted something about not wanted to say the stock market (and by implication bond and commodity markets) being some type of a gamble, or at least require some type of guessing correctly to make money. I still have not figured this one out
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0602/month-oil-spill-goldman-sachs-sold-250-million-bp-stock/
I don't think Goldman has any excuse but blind luck. I also suspect that this has happened to bond vigilantes. But sometimes being lucky is better than being good.
Tom -- so here are my responses.
ReplyDelete1. I have 29 posts now -- so please be more specific about my stock market comment.
2. Luck is nice to have, but Goldman and these bond vigilantes cannot stay in business hoping for luck. I stick with my previous comment that speculators benefit the most when they are in line with the fundamentals. Sometimes this process is ugly when it leads to undesirable outcomes for many in the markets.
3. I like your comments about exchange rates, but keep in mind that I was trying to make one point and I used a few examples to explain it -- that emphasizing the role of the market or nominal exchange rate is too simple and can be misleading. While each of my examples could be elaborated -- as you have -- they are only meant to show why there are important factors impacting trade that go beyond market exchange rates. Your noting that taxes are important is correct. Other things I omitted include tariffs and other forms of protectionism, relative country growth, innovations and productivity, and more. Yes, macro and international trade books include these things.