I don’t know about you but I am ready to turn my Walkman on
full volume until election day. I’d rather hear Barry Manilow sing Mandy 10,000
times or have a double order of extra-garlic kimchi jammed into my ears than go
through what is only going to get worse as we approach the Tuesday after the
first Monday in November.
Mitt Romney chose a running mate and you would have thought
from the bloody howls of the Democrats that he was supposed to pick Nancy
Pelosi or Paul Krugman. Tone it down dudes – Paul Ryan is a Republican. As a
result he has already signed a pledge in pickle juice to hate unions,
emasculate females, reduce entitlements to a negative number, and find new ways
to keep Romney’s average tax rate at .000001% of his income.
Sure, it is easy enough to turn off the TV, radio, iphone,
ipad, ipod, car radio, and your next-door-neighbor, but geez, how did we get
from there to here. And when I say there, I am remembering the time when you actually
had to go downtown to buy a newspaper. Our TV had “rabbit ears” adorned with
tin or aluminum foil and had a tiny screen that was best suited for a haze
induced coma or some form of mediation. The closest thing you could get to news
came from Edward R. Murrow and Ed Sullivan. Instead of somewhat objective news
and commentary about once a week, we now get hot-off-the-press minute by minute
reports and debates about Romney’s latest prostate scores. What a mess.
What can a moderate, thoughtful, rule-following, JD chugging
person like you and I do for the next few months? My advice is to chew your
meat at least 20 times before swallowing and to try to stay above the fray.
While the former is easy to do, the latter is harder and takes practice. Just
because all your relatives are extremist wackos does not mean you have to get
sucked into arguments. For example, Ashley asserts that the world is clearly
flat. Jason retorts that it is clearly not flat and explains passionately that
it is hilly. Clearly all it takes is a quick drive though Brown County Indiana
to see that the world is not flat. While Ashley says I always take Jason’s
side, in this case it is best to stand back and let them argue. You and I and
another 2 billion people who have passed third grade astrophysics all know that
the world is a square planet that revolves around the moon but there is no real
way to convince J&A of that point as they finger-point and mud wrestle.
That’s why I say that staying above the fray is important.
Getting sucked into arguments between people with extreme views is basically a
waste of time and good mental health. But that doesn’t mean one does nothing.
It is true that it is hard to see a time when moderate views will prevail but
one does not have to give up or give in. I once visited with Latvians who
longed for the day when they would be free from the Soviet Union. They had to
go through the motions each day as a Soviet citizen but many of them kept sane
by planning for how they would again freely use their own language,re-introduce their former currency the Lat, and return to drinking copious amounts of
Aldaris.
What does that mean for the people of the US? Could we
please give up on identifying Romney’s tax returns and Obama’s college records?
Instead we might want to think about some of the critical issues of the day.
Health care problems were not solved by Obamacare. Just like Medicare D taught
us, a new entitlement is going to cost us zillions more than initially anticipated.
You do not have to be a Republican to wonder how we are going to pay for the
healthcare services that will be required by tens of millions of newly eligible
people. Then add to that the pressure of the boomers on social security, poorly
funded private pensions, and the prune industry. Oh yes and we still seem to
have a few problems left in housing, banks, and other financial institutions.
No one has uttered a word about how to better reduce poverty and we have
nothing but hot hair when it comes to facilitating job-creating long-term
economic growth.
The point is that we have some difficult political decisions
to make and while the zealots running our country now seem hopeless at even
discussing whether to order white or wheat bread, it won’t hurt us to get
educated about ways we can actually solve some of these problems. If you want to learn how to build a house
there are good sources of information to accomplish this. This approach is
better than letting your neighbors drink your expensive wheat beer while they
hotly debate the pros and cons of wood versus aluminum siding. The same is true
for economic issues. There are many good things to read and programs to watch
that avoid ideological purity.
Perhaps those of you who are still either awake and/or sober
might help me with this discussion. Do you have recommendations for highly
readable and minimally biased sources of economic information about our current
economic problems? What do you recommend? Can you recommend a good source for
housing problems? Healthcare policy? Maybe if we use this blog to share good
sources of information that will help divert our attention away from all the
stupid stuff we read and see. I promise (ha ha) to reward each recommender with
a free bottle of virtual JD.
I can kick this off a little bit. Most US regional Federal Reserve banks
have publications, for example the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis publishes
National Economic Trends and Monetary Trends. The US government has many good
sources of information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (employment and
inflation), the Bureau of Economic Analysis (GDP and international trade), and
the Congressional Budget Office. The World Trade Organization, The
International Monetary Fund and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development are international organizations that among other things publish
macroeconomic forecasts for the world. Your local college or town probably has
non-political forums or guest speakers that are not always highly ideological.
I know what you are saying – Larry, this is like work. But
let’s face it – you have a choice. You can listen to idiots shout at each other
in bright, vivid colors with lots of useless and annoying commercials – or you
can use that time to do something positive. Better yet, you can keep reading
this blog and send money so that I can take care of my wacky relatives.
I think I'll keep reading the blog.........but don't hold your breath for the money.
ReplyDeleteMy only question is about those "entitlements" for the poor. Who provides the definition of "poor?" That's what I thought.
I am not holding my breath Fuzzy. :-)
DeleteDear LSD. I'll be short, to the point, and simple (no comment necessary). Just pull the red lever across the board.
ReplyDeleteSurprise surprise. :-)
DeleteWow! Yes I am more than tired of hear all of this crap. As a moderate myself I do not believe in extremes of any kind. They only set the limits by which the moderates can get something done. Now those limits are so wide apart and the lies, half truth and other gurgle are so much fiction that Jules Vern could not use it...and nothing gets done.
ReplyDeleteWe are not solving the problems. Our leaders or “want to be leaders” are just creating distractions to smoke screen their own BS. When 30 million boomers hit the Healthcare and SS funds along with an already retired population that is living longer despite some of them trying obesity to cut that life span....chaos and dysfunctionality will then be the norm.
When long term jobs are not created for a wide range of reasons that are not acceptable to me then who is going to pay the taxes to support the programs....or better yet who is going to take care of the jobless or the underemployed who will living below the poverty level...however that is defined.
The poverty level...how to solve that issue. It sure would not be the Great Society...that never worked and made things worse. Education, training, and an environment for job creation help to bring back those pathways that used to be available to climb up the economic ladder. When poverty grows larger and middle class grows smaller those are danger signs. Entitlements were never intended to be permanent but only to help the people get back on their feet. They should be tied to that unless the recipient has no other choice for help
No matter whart you think -- it is worth a serious discussion. Let them study the facts and come up with some solutions that make sense. That might work better than name calling.
DeleteSurprise surprise pleasant surprise is not having to listen to B. Manilow.
ReplyDeleteI hear Ayn whispering in my ear, "I told you so."
ReplyDeleteAnd what do you whisper back to her?
ReplyDeleteWhat? You think I'm crazy? I don't talk to dead people! I'm not from Chicago!
ReplyDeletehttp://www.ftportfolios.com/retail/blogs/Economics/index.aspx
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of finding factual sources and not the biased ones from the parties and their surrogate money sources. Is the CBO really that trustworthy as a source? Do the FRB's have an agenda themselves which would make data/advice suspect? As with California, we can make assumptions about tax revenue but what's realistic for the next 24 months? The best kickstart for the economy is a president who shows leadership and asks every citizen to stop whining and take any job. Mitt has said so much to his flock when counseling them. The idea that somebody else must help me is the antithesis of what our Founders envisioned. They were not of the socialist persuasion, I feel certain.
ReplyDeleteProbably no source is 100% objective. The CBO is pretty good and so is the Fed. The economists who write for the Fed are pretty much academics and do not have to tow any official Fed line when they write in their publications. Thanks for your comments. Whenever I see your name I think of your Dad and what an important man he was in my own development. I smile ever time I think of chesse and crackers!
ReplyDelete