Whether we
need it or not the International Monetary Fund (IMF) publishes a global
forecast twice a year. The October 2013
World Economic Outlook was recently announced with about as much fanfare as
a rodeo in Ithaca, New York. The link to this several hundred page tome is http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/02/. Luckily one can read what they call
the front matter to get the main points. The Wall Street Journal did a nice summary on October 9, "IMF’s
Pessimism on Global Growth Widens". Pretty graphs reveal the key points – as
compared to last April, the IMF has a revised downward the expected future
growth of the world economy. They also forecast an increase in GDP on the Uranus but their interplanetary accuracy is not quite up to Earth standards. With
respect to Earth the biggest story line is the downward revision of future
economic growth rates of the emerging and developing countries. The average expected future growth of advanced economies was unchanged from April – but the IMF is much
more downbeat about short-term prospects of places like Brazil, Russia,
India and China.
Why do I
bother you with this? For one thing I needed a good reason to pour a cool JD. JD
seems to go well with this activity and we all know the old saying that a JD a
day keeps the doctor away. But I jest. The real reason I write about this is to
gloat. On September 20 my blog was entitled The G20 Blame Game and in that blog
my main point was that the emerging countries should quit pointing their fingers
of blame at the US and start taking care of their own destinies. I know many of
you think I make this stuff up between taking out the garbage and sharpening my
dart skills – but I am always pleased to find out that REAL working economists
agree with my stuff.
Oliver
Blanchard, the IMF’s Chief Economist said, “Emerging markets should use the
small window of time available to get their economic houses in order.” The
small window is the time before the US Fed begins to taper monetary policy.
With Janet Yellen as the new Fed chair that window could be longer than Blanchard
believes. But let’s go along with the idea of a short window – what is
Blanchard recommending?
The first
thing he is not recommending for the emerging nations is more Keynesian policy.
He seems to be suggesting that Keynesian expansion is what helped them get into
their current mess when he says “the potential reversal of years of cheap cash
exposed years of financial and economic weakness.”
So what do
you do if you can’t simply open the fiscal and monetary spigots? While Blanchard
would probably never utter the words “supply-side economic policies” it is hard
to differentiate the IMF’s recommendations from a supply-side approach. I
cherry-picked some of the report’s main
points…
- Curbing potential economic expansion are competitive constraints, infrastructure bottlenecks, and slowing investments
- China should rebalance away from exports to domestic consumption
- India and Brazil should remove barriers to foreign investment
- Countries with large budget deficits need to tighten
- Turkey and other countries with high inflation rates must raise interest rates and put in more credible monetary policy
- Emerging markets should let their currencies depreciate
- Europe needs to work on a unified fiscal budget and a banking union
- Japan must continue its economic restructuring
- The Fed should not begin to taper this year but should be ready by 2014 and
- The US government must solve its budget stalemate
My tendency is to think that the IMF is about as useful as those dingleberries orbiting Uranus.
ReplyDeleteYou never miss a word Fuzz. You must have been an attentive pilot. Anyway, the IMF allows government leaders a nice place to meet and a lot of good food and wine to ingest. When they are engaged in those activities they are not at home destroying their respective economies. So that is pretty useful. eh
DeleteAgreed! Is there any way we can get the federal government to go on vacation? Oh wait! We just did that, didn't we? What a nice 16 days it was, too!
ReplyDeleteThere seems to be a wide gulf between what the IMF thinks of the world;s finances/economy and what the US's FED thinks. The clash is that the US keeps feeding money to the banks in their easing program in fear that the fragile ...if not low level recovery ....will weaken and stop. They are in the wrong ball park but the stock market likes it because the banks are flush with cash and the brokers often think in the very short term for their own welfare. The FED is not responsible for jobs...just money flow. On the other hand the IMF is seeing a much broader picture with all types of economic systems from Communist Capitalism to Pure Free Markets. Regardless of the system, the name of the game is trade and employment. In other words IMF represents Micro and the US represents a kind of macro-micro since our GDP is such a large portion of the world's economy. Like congress one cannot do without the other. Much of the unrest in the world is not so much religion or philosophical differences but employment and happiness or the lack thereof. The UN pales here because they attempt to solve that problem by really not recognizing the the underlying issues. IMF is, to me, the only global group that has the sword of ecocnomics and finance as a tool.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately James, that sword is more like a toothpick. The IMF has no real clout. The US government can enact legislation - good or bad -- and that impacts the US and the world. The IMF however mostly just preaches. It controls almost nothing. When countries borrow from the IMF it can impose restrictions but even that is usually pretty light fare. I like it when the IMF preaches the right stuff and that's why I wrote the last post. Of course a lot of what the IMF preaches is not so helpful as in their promoting a financial sales tax in Europe.
DeleteWell, it looks as if the IMF isn't being helped by the ECB.
ReplyDeletehttp://news.yahoo.com/falling-inflation-another-headache-ecb-142804299--finance.html
Yup Fuzz, the ECB wants to out-stupid the Fed.
Delete