There is
nothing wrong with that logic except that it is incomplete. It focuses only on
the bilateral relations between us and them. The bigger picture examines the
importance of trade to the USA and its main trading partners.
Let’s begin
with a review of the countries that purportedly take advantage of us in the USA. President Trump’s goal is to reduce bilateral trade deficits. Below I list
the biggest bilateral US trade deficits in billions of dollars in 2017:
China
$375
Mexico
71
Japan
69
Germany
64
Vietnam 38
Ireland
38
Italy 32
Malaysia 25
India 23
South
Korea 23
(Also among
the top 15 countries are Thailand, Canada, Taiwan, France, and Switzerland.)
According to President Trump those countries are the “bad actors.” Notice that China holds a special distinction
because the US trade deficit with that one country roughly equals the trade
deficit with the next nine. China and the others, according to the logic
discussed above, ought to cave soon because they sell so much to the USA. If we
tax all that inflow to the US, it could hurt them a lot.
Let’s
widen the story. Think about the importance of trade to these countries.
The next table shows the total trade deficit of each country – the
trade deficit of each country with the rest of the world. That deficit is
presented as a percentage of each country’s GDP. Note that the corresponding
number for the USA in 2017 was 2.8%.
China
Surplus
Mexico
1.4
Japan 3.9
Germany Surplus
Vietnam 6.2
Ireland 0.9
Italy 1.4
Malaysia 3.0
India 6.4
S.
Korea Surplus
The point? These countries, except China, Germany, and South Korea, have trade deficits too. How willing do
you think they will be to making their deficits larger so that the US can have
a smaller one?
Next, let’s turn to imports. If President
Trump had his way, we wouldn’t import anything, except for maybe Cognac and a
cigar or two. But he wants the bad actors to buy more from us. He wants them to import more. Below I report
each country’s imports as a percentage of its GDP. US imports were 15% of GDP in 2017.
China 18%
Mexico
40
Japan
15
Germany
40
Vietnam
99
Ireland 88
Italy 28
Malaysia 64
India 22
South
Korea 38
The point? These countries love imports even more than we do.
But how much more can a country import when it already has a trade deficit? How
much more of US exports can they consume?
It is nice to think that we are being
taken advantage of by the rest of the world. But the larger truth is that many
countries have trade deficits and already import a lot of goods and services.
This reality is surely going to stiffen their backs as the US tries to solve
its own trade problems by limiting imports to the US and raising exports to the rest of the world.
Dear LSD. My take on what DJT desires is not to provoke surpluses with all trading partners but rather to level the field and in particular achieve fairness (as with China’s theft of 'merican IP). I don’t think he’d take issue with reasonable (however that is defined in the eye of the beholder) surpluses/deficits as long as he sees ’merican jobs and wages doing well.
ReplyDeleteI doubt Trump would consider any country's surplus with us as reasonable. But that wasn't my point today. I was trying to say that many countries have a surplus with us but a deficit with the world -- and they have very high imports. These countries might not want to negotiate with Trump since a win for Trump means an even bigger deficit for them.
DeleteObviously I failed Evelyn Wood speed reading.
DeleteThat's what Pete told me so it must be true. :-) Keep on truckin.
DeleteGlobal trade is a fact of life and the transition of many of these countries with a economic cost advantage to compete on price. Quality also comes into play as the US and other wealthier trading partners expect it. Korea has done well in this area as has Japan. Wages are another issue. We are transitioning from a closed economy system to a global free market system. Just as Japan did in post WWII they caught up, pay similar wages, have a middle class and make good products. The others will eventually follow. Global trade with some countries like Vietnam is much more powerful than a war.
ReplyDeletePutting aside the already mentioned issue of IP theft along with things like China putting spyware in some of the tec stuff they sell to us there is still a 500 pound monkey in the room.
ReplyDeleteThere is a reason the US dollar is the reserve currency for the world and the renminbi is ignored to a great extent. Currencies that float like the dollar are a safer option while the renminbi is manipulated to make goods and services from China better able to compete.
For as long as I can remember the US has allowed almost every country to institute trade rules that disadvantage the US and often manipulate their currencies.
I am not aware of the official definition of "trade war" but it is possible to make an argument that a country that manipulates it's currency and has rules that restrict or require certain things in trade is engaging in a trade war.
Thanks Rage. Not sure it matters a lot which is the chicken and which is the egg. What matters is if there is a real trade war. My piece thinks that our trade partners may be willing to risk a trade war these days. They have a lot to lose by not resisting US demands -- even if the US demands are reasonable.
Delete