Tuesday, July 13, 2021

The Federal Reserve is Irrelevant

The US federal Reserve met on July 7 and much was decided after a sumptuous lunch of baloney. With straight faces and expensive suits, they looked the camera in the eye and said that they had decided not to forecast the weather and that they were not perfectly sure about the future of interest rates and monetary policy. But they were quite certain that they would meet again and bring up the fact maybe possibly they might change policy. Exciting stuff. 

Apparently the private sector financial players have turned into a bunch of meanies. They lurk in dark places just waiting for the next taper tantrum. That is, they apparently sit around all day and wait for a Fed official to say something about tapering Federal Reserve purchases of government bonds. Such a taper would reduce the demand and prices of government bonds in the markets and thus cause interest rates to rise. Just the smell of such a possibility has private sector vultures ready to swoop first. If they move before the Fed moves, then they are able to "sell high and buy low" -- the dream of all financial players.  Of course, this has the market effect of forcing up interest rates even before the Fed does anything. 

So it behooves the Fed to say confusing and meaningless things so that the private sector meanies don't mess up the economy. 

While the above is a lot of fun and almost makes some sense, there is a more somber picture hiding out there. None of the above mentions the real culprit in all this monetary policy hooey -- our friends in government. By government I mean President Joe and his colleagues and the people who run Congress. The Fed and monetary policy are not exactly immune or walled off from what that government does. 

I am not talking about DC hot dog weenie roasts or the late night parties. I am referring to the thing we dearly called the government deficit. While there is quite an IQ deficit in government, the deficit we can measure is called the Federal Government Budget Deficit. If you haven't looked lately, it now amounts to about $3 trillion per year. That $3 trillion dwarfs anything that went before it. 

So what? A bunch of DC accountants come up with a big negative number. Who cares? Well, you do and so does the Fed. That $3 trillion government deficit means that the government cannot pay for all its goodies. It is $3 trillion short this year (and last year). Where do they get that $3 trillion so they can spend it? They don't get a personal loan from Donald Trump or Bill Gates, that's for sure.

They borrow it from you! Well maybe not you but they borrow it from the general public. They sell government bonds and we buy them. Money that we might have used to buy Amazon stock or a new roll of toilet paper, we instead send to Joe and he sends us a piece of paper called a government bond. And you thought the government just printed a bunch of $100 dollar bills. No way, it is just as easy to sell bonds. They will give us our money back later. No big deal. In the meantime Joe gets $3 tril.

So what? Here's where the Fed comes in. During a time when the government is flooding the market with bonds, financial markets go crazy. A modest amount of bond sales would be fine. But $3 trillion? Wow. Now that's a story.  The $3 trillion of bonds for sale greatly exceeds the demand for bonds so the price of bonds falls...and interest rates rise. 

Aha. It is Joe and his buddies -- not the Fed -- who are the real causes of higher interest rates. And that harm has already been done. Bam. Government deficits cause interest rates to rise. Period. 

All that mumbo jumbo about inflation and how the Fed will react to it is supposed to divert your attention. It makes for great newspaper sales and for colorful evening news. And even though Joe and his buddies are the real culprits, we focus our misguided attention on the Fed. And the Fed, not having the courage to tell the truth, does the government's bidding. The Fed jumps in the market and buys all (or some of) those bonds that are sitting around unsold. What a tag team! Joe and his buddies sell a bunch of bonds and the Fed buys them like they were tacos at Taco Bell. And yes, the rumor is true. The Fed can create money and buy as much they want. 

The net effect is to forestall the downward price of the bonds and viola -- and puts a ceiling on the interest rates. Well, maybe. Maybe for a second.  If the Fed pumps in too much money and keeps rates too low, then inflation, which is always lurking in the shadows, will come back to haunt us -- eventually raising interest rates and causing all sorts of havoc. 

So we come back to the Fed. Will they or won't they? It really doesn't matter because the real problem is Joe and his buddies. They show no signs of conducting an honorable fiscal policy. So long as they choose to spend like drunken sailors, things will not be well in the metropolis. Doesn't matter much what the Fed says or does.  Taper tantrum or not. Those evil financial firms understand all this and they are ready to pounce at a moment's notice. 

10 comments:

  1. Dear LSD. I wud change your title to “The Federal Reserve is (almost) irrelevant” though you make a compelling case that it’s comparable to monkeys trying to have sex with a footbowl. Me tinkz there are too many variables that could affect interest rates. Joke Biten’s fawning lust for higher taxes, massive deficit spending (and imminent balloon’n national deficit to infinity should those come to pass), destruction of our energy independence resulting in higher prices as oil-based products become more expensive . . . portend rates rising to offset fiery? inflation if\when it comes (e.g. Fed knee-jerk reaction). On the other hand (and you know ‘other hand’ stuff . . .), falling T-bills’ rates suggest markets don’t see inflation as a big deal. And financial talk’n headz are split on Fed efficacy and on whether equity marketz will continue to rise or suffer a major bear bite—if ‘n when Joke’s anti-‘merikan lustful polices get pass’d without mitigation from House/Senate Rs.

    To say that Joke and his Keystone Kopz buddies show no signs of conducting an honorable fiscal policy is an understatement. How can a dolt who can’t even manage a wird salad even begin to unnerstand basic supply\demand stuff as you allude to when saying an over-supply of bondz will cause rates to rise? The only relevance the Fed will have is when/if flam’n inflation startz to sizzle and Powell et al rush in with hoses full-0-high falut’n rates to douse the flamz. Then we’ll hear the bear growl and those evil financial firms howl.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tuna, Looks like we pretty much agree. The fit is going to hit the Shan one way of another

      Delete
  2. Well maybe. If the government ( Joe et al) spend on projects to save money in the long run and improve our real security and infrastructure then good. But that will not and has not happened with any President and or Congress or Senate. Too may pieces are dropped and other non related pieces are added on to the deficit because they represent no return measured in the short or long term. Each 4 years the process gets more and more political and not useful. Higher interest rates only would cut off the building boom as well as make products all kind more expense and stop those loan offers we all get to pay of previous credit card use in one package. Asia does our manufacturing. All we do is sell stuff and support the sale with a loan or credit card.

    Reality is we do not seem to overcome the repeat rodeo. Ignorance? Lack of caring if it does affect you? Lazy?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jim. Let me try again. The government has already put into play the forces that are raising and will continue to raise interest rates. The Fed is irrelevant. If they monetize the deficits inflation will come and cause interest rates to rise. If the Fed does not monetize the deficits, then credit markets will create higher interest rates. Either way we are doomed. Joe and his friends have already set the forces in motion. The Fed is irrelevant.

      Delete
    2. Possibly Congress needs a few intelligent economist as advisors.
      Sounds like a catch 22.

      Delete
    3. It's worse than a Catch22. There is too much money at stake. If your job gave you a money printing machine and your employment depended on votes, you'd behave just like these politicians. Many economists benefit from the same situation.

      Delete
  3. Or…maybe “Open Market Operations” will come to mean, “What happens if the Treasury holds a bond auction and the Fed doesn’t show up to the party?” I’m thinking that’s when things get REALLY ugly. Unless…UNLESS Biden gets his tax increases to the point where some inflation gets delayed. Of course, the problem with taxation of the rich is that it tends to hit Investment harder than consumption, so we could see something resembling the 70s where investments reprice downward while consumer prices continue to rise. The other problem with taxing the rich is that in order to get enough revenue to make any difference, you have to pull a Sweden (at least as it once was) and define pretty much everybody as rich. But I agree with you that either way is ugly…unless you’re a young person who knows how to work hard. Those folks may come out better off than most, as competition for those folks may drive wage inflation beyond consumer prices…Retirees could see a scary moment, however, and the moment might last a while.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nice to hear from you Malcolm! My belief is that the Fed under Powell will never fail to come to the party. Or if and when he does fail to show up, it will be so late that inflation is already raging. Yep, they eventually will want to tax the rich and that will hurt but once the cat is out of the bottle it is not easy to get it back in. Maybe people will react by pulling away from material pursuits and focus more on spiritual and other alternative life styles? If the government mucks up the economy then maybe its best to escape the economy? Or maybe go to Cuba? :-)

      Delete
  4. …Focus on spiritual and other lifestyles…? Was it Marx who said, “Religion is the opiate of the masses”? Perhaps as states rush decriminalizing marijuana, it will be the new opiate of the masses.

    ReplyDelete