Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Maria, Tony, and the Debtside Story

As the deficit version of the West Side Story plays out in Washington I wanted to make sure I got my frog in the race. Right now there are two things stuck in my JD (I don’t know what a craw is or it would be stuck there.)

The first is this quote I got from Bloomberg.com after the President’s speech last week.
President Barack Obama cast his disagreements with Republicans in deficit negotiations as a struggle between the interests of hedge-fund managers and corporate jet owners against those of the elderly and college students as he pressed congressional leaders to accept tax increases.

The second has to do with a Congressional divide that would only take second place to the gang wars between the Jets and the Sharks. Who can forget the words, “When you’re a Jet you’re a Jet all the way from your first cigarette to your last dying day… When you’re a jet, you’re the swingin’est thing: Little boy you’re a man; little man you’re a king. Is it possible that Democrats or the Republics could be any stupid-er than these guys?

Keep in mind that the Westside Story is a musical. But apparently it took the death of Tony for Maria and the other idiots to realize that they had to change their habits – like stop hating and killing each other.

So let’s pursue this second point a bit. I will get back to the first one shortly. The Democrats stare into the camera with that beagle look and say that to be fair any solution to a huge and growing debt must involve tax increases. If the Rs will not cotton to major tax increases, then the Ds are going to take their balls home. The Rs look into a camera on another network which will remain nameless since Fox swears it is not a tool of the R party. The Rs look earnest and caring when they explain that an increase in taxes will utterly destroy the universe as well as the US economy.

Now back to the first point. Will someone please get President Obama off the golf course and explain to him that sometimes the interests of the elderly, college students, hedge-fund managers, and corporate jet owners coincide? EVERYTHING is not a gang war between the many groups that comprise our nice country. Maybe the tall guy on the basketball team makes more money than the short guy – but knocking 2 inches off the biggest guy and giving it to the shortest one is not really going to produce a winning record.

Why does the President, when given the microphone and the attention of the US public, have to grovel in this class-war crap? Why does he think he increases his popularity among voters when he plays the Jets/Sharks card? What matters for the poor, the young, the old and for Hollywood movie stars is that the US economy grows. While Keynesians and others might bicker about the best short-run macro models and policies, there is hardly any debate about the long-run model which says that three things cause growth – labor employed, capital employed, and productivity.

Enough about the President. Let’s get to the Rs and Ds. They just don’t get it. The Rs play to the Jets and the Ds to the Sharks. That’s it. End of story. I know the Rs and Ds have seen Westside Story and I know they know the ending. So why do they want Tony to die before everyone becomes friends and they live happily ever after? Can we not learn anything from musicals? I guess not (I learned a lot from Hair and from Buddy, but that’s a different topic for a later posting.)

If you are a good R or a passionate D you are ready to beat me with my own JD bottle. You just know you are right and the other guy is wrong. Davidson is a silly compromiser who just doesn’t get it. The R tells me that tax increases are just going to send the wrong message and before you know it, spending will resume its usual path and we will be back in this pickle again. The D tells me how unfair it is to keep helping the rich when there are so many people suffering. You know what – you are both right! But dudes (and dudesses) – you gotta put first things first.

You are playing with a wet firecracker. You don’t know when it is going to go off but if you keep playing with it – it is going to blow us all up! The Greeks were in the streets protesting austerity and many Americans will be on US avenues too. But finally the Greek government showed some real leadership – something that is sadly lacking in America. I am not going to quote deficit/debt numbers because you see them too often. But if you think the deficit/debt future looks bad now please understand that the scarey numbers you are seeing are already part of an optimistic scenario that assumes low interest rates and relatively strong economic growth. More reasonable estimates of future interest rates and GDP growth suggest that debt is even worse by multiples. We don’t seem much bothered by debt/GDP ratios of 100% but within a few years this number could exceed 150%. That’s pretty close to killing Tony.

So maybe we shouldn’t raise taxes. And maybe we shouldn’t reduce entitlements. But if our government doesn’t soon show the world that we have a plan to put our debt/deficits in order, we are going to be soon helping Maria find a new partner.  

And let me throw this out – a solution isn’t that hard to find. Taxing the rich and businesses right now is not a good idea. But that doesn’t mean we can’t legislate a plan to increase future tax revenue in the context of a major tax reform. In fact, a good deal of the tax revenue decreases we witnessed over the last two years was caused by the recession and will disappear as we grow. Recall that much of the spending increases were supposed to be temporary – designed to kick-start the economy. Well, the recession ended two years ago. Undoing those programs should not be called a spending decrease. It should be called keeping a promise. Entitlements should not be untouchable either. Too many level-headed people have shown that you can make relatively small changes to the major entitlement programs without hurting the old or the young too much.

This is all very doable. But it takes some real leaders who understand that the Jets/Sharks mentality is really stupid and self-defeating. Maybe when voters understand this, they will stop voting for these troublemakers and we can get on with solving some very challenging economic problems. 

17 comments:

  1. It has gotten to the point that the paradigm is the new normal sort of like the Hatfields and McCoys who constantly fought over their corn patch from which they made their best mash. Who loses on this deal is all of the consumers in their region. Who wins? The non consumers of corn mash. The solution, tax the mash and guess what..we all have better stuff to drink now.

    What I see the R's and D's doing is posturing and if we do not watch carefully they will come up with another looks like a duck but is not a duck budget cutting deal like they did last year. Why, because they all know that they want to keep their very lucrative and honorable jobs. Tto do this means bringing home the bacon and bacon cost money and the US cannot print any more so there is no choice but to continue raising the debt ceiling..at least as long as there is China out there to buy up our debt.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Notice Larry, Tony had to die to get their attention and to allow Natalie Wood to eventually marry Bob Wagner. Unfortunately, even major catastrophes don't seem to get politicians' attentions these days except to further their causes. To paraphrase the new mayor of Chicago, "A crisis is a terrible thing to waste." However, it seems the medicinal potion is always compounded in order to kill the patient.

    I have to agree with Mark Halperin on his inadvertent analysis of the president's verbal diarrhea although I would have been nicer and referred to him by the opposite side of his anatomy. I suppose the Prez forgot that the corporate jet-owner thing was a product of the ribbed-tickler, stimulus package concocted almost entirely by a majorly D-controlled Congress and White House. Yes, and brain-dead Rs voted for it almost en mass.

    Altogether, the song sounds the same from years gone by. Tax the rich, sock it to the corporations except somehow the weasels seem to dodge their own bullets. If we taxed all of the millionaires and billionaires at 100%, the feds would wind up with something like $980B. That sounds like a lot of money until you stack it up beside $14T, and that's a conservative number. It might fund our 3 wars for about 6 months.

    Level-headed, common sense, and real leadership do not translate inside the Beltway. Sometimes I think that maybe if we had the Beltway obliterated, some level-headed, common sense leadership could sneak in and have some real impact. As it is, the Beltway seems to be the outer limits of a vacuum. Inside of that monument to traffic, it just....well, sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mr. LSD, since I’m a bottom line guy and you are a bottom of the JD bottle kind of guy let’s just go straight to the bottom, which I believe is the philosophical difference between the Rs and Ds. Rs want smaller govomit and Ds want the govomit to be big momma. The former relies on less $$ in DC and the former more $$ to make big momma fat and fatter. For decades the Ds have been winning with the help of RINO Rs and have grown govomit via indulgence and gluttony to the point of cardiac arrest. Medically speaking, to save her and her family, big momma must not only reduce intake but also get on a tread mill to slim down, which is analogous to R philosophy.

    As to the Rs and Ds not getting it I disagree: the Rs get it ( . . . . ahem, the true Rs do and the RINOs might not). If the Rs (both true and unwilling RINOs) stick to their present positions (not acquiescing or compromising to D’s big momma), big moma’s life might be extended to continue provide for her family albeit that it also must reduce intake and lose weight. Only a united R can force big momma to accept the needed remedy. It’s that simple: no income tax increases (although tax code revisions to eliminate credits and loopholes) and actual reduced spending.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Charles,

    Even if the Rs are the good guys there is such a thing as overplaying your hand and LOSING. They have control of one house and one house only. There is only so much they can get done right now. They can overplay their hand and contribute to a financial panic in the the USA which could create even more economic misery and be very hard to exit. If you read my compromise you will see that there are solutions that would satisfy most Rs -- and that mostly focus on reducing spending but while allowing for the fact that some taxes can be raised as we reduce the share of GDP taken by spending and revenues. Thus government as a share of the economy could be seriously reduced as we attend to this debt ceiling standoff.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Lar, I vote that your taxes be raised and that mine stay where they are.

    The problem isn't so much the Rs and Ds as it is the progressives on both sides of the aisle, and there are way too many. They wear the camouflage of "reasonableness" but really all want a government that controls every facet of our lives. The debt ceiling is just so much smoke blown into our eyes and up our posterior orifices.

    ReplyDelete
  6. First off I have to correct this error in your original post:

    "But dudes (and dudesses) – you gotta put first things first. "

    The right word is dudette.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Now to the substance of this quotation"

    "But if you think the deficit/debt future looks bad now please understand that the scarey numbers you are seeing are already part of an optimistic scenario that assumes low interest rates and relatively strong economic growth."

    Assumptions are one thing and while I agree most analysis is too optimistic there is another very real problem.

    We all remember good old Charles Ponzi; not to mention the good he did which resulted in wide spread use of the term "generally accepted accounting principles". Even the folks who think CPA stands for Corrupt Price Adjuster usually agree that a set of books that conforms to "generally accepted accounting principles" provides a realistic assessment of an organization's financial situation. But perhaps more to the point even a corrupt price adjuster would agree that current government accounting practice does not conform to "generally accepted accounting principles".

    Until we get a real analysis of the financial situation government is in it is a tall order to try and figure out what to do.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If it looks and quacks like a duck...

    ReplyDelete
  9. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, take it to Peking and roast it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304760604576425793342142396.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories

    I like this analysis. Both Ds and Rs have dug us into a hole so deep, we may not be able to get out. Meanwhile, the government continues to dig.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Maybe they will dig all the way to China.

    ReplyDelete
  12. http://blog.heritage.org/2011/07/07/morning-bell-in-debt-limit-debate-higher-taxes-arent-the-answer/

    ReplyDelete
  13. Evidently, Heritage has been reading your blog!

    ReplyDelete
  14. At least 25 people in the White House don't.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Time.....NewsWeek and USN&WR.....marches on.

    ReplyDelete