Wednesday, August 10, 2011

TC is PC for Monetary Policy


I learned a new word today – TC. TC is not really a word but it is already being bandied about in the news – Time Commitment.  I have to admit that in all my years of teaching macro and money I never once used that term. Apparently TC implies a promise by the Fed to keep interest rates low for two years. It is kind of like me promising to not eat giant ribeye steaks for two years… it sounds like a sane thing to do but it probably ain’t gonna happen.

That is not to say I am not relieved that the market headed upward yesterday. I appreciate that. But like many things in this world, I am not completely convinced that the relief investors felt yesterday is going to last. I know – you hate it when economists spread gloom and doom – but let’s face it – TC really means two things. First, it means that the Fed did almost nothing yesterday. Second, it means that the Fed raised – not lowered – the riskiness of our economic environment.  I started writing this BEFORE the market opened today but I just looked and it appears that the DJ is down almost 400 points!

Promising to keep interest rates low for two years seems to have reassured frantic investors for a moment but what have they really done with this promise? They did nothing insofar as policy goes to reduce interest rates further. They did nothing to change the amount of reserves in the banking system. They did nothing to generate a new loan or make banks more willing to make loans. They did make a promise – one that cannot and will not be kept. What we most care about for economic activity is longer-term rates and the Fed has no magical or direct influence on these rates. They are set in markets. When the economy slows down or when inflations expectations decrease – interest rates decrease. When the economy speeds up or if inflation signals higher future prices interest rates often rise.

In short TC might be PC (since it appears to have assuaged investors for a day) but it didn’t do one positive thing. But it does promise to come back with a royal boot to the national buttocks. Did you hear anyone saying last week that the reason all hell was coming unglued was because interest rates were too high. I don’t recall because I was being run over by debt ceilings and government debts and Chinese inflation and several other things. But nowhere in that economic haze was anyone crying about high interest rates.

So what gives? Some analysts are pointing out that the economy is very weak. They believe that the Fed’s actions will somehow strengthen the economy and therefore have a continuing positive effect on the stock market. But if trillions of additional reserves supplied by the Fed during the last two years didn’t work, then why would a silly commitment to keep interest rates low for the next two years have any impact on anything?

The most tragic thing about what they did yesterday is that they scared the hell out of us by underscoring two points. First, they admitted that the government has no more tools to use to stimulate the economy – even in the short-run. Second, policymakers at the Fed are so alarmed at the current weak economy that they have to drum up a silly policy that everyone knows has nothing to do with our current ills.

We all know why the market fell and we all know that it has nothing to do with interest rates that are too high. If our problems today have anything to do with monetary policy, they probably stem from too much outstanding money and the risk of higher inflation. Some economists have clearly pointed out that inflation is one of the few ways to “solve” our debt overhang. Rating agencies have also been very clear that such a policy will only lead to future downgrades. So if anything, a policy that ends up with even more monetary policy stimulation increases the risk of more trouble down the road.

Finally, the problems in the market are probably more dominated by non-monetary factors. By admitting that all we have left are monetary tools – we once again take our eye off the ball. If this monetary action takes the heat off Washington and stalls or prevents them from IMMEDIATELY solving our deficit/debt/regulation issues – then the public will once again be duped by our snake oil sales staff in DC. The market seems to be recognizing this fact this morning. But today’s market performance is not the final judge – what matters is the future course of the economy.

I read and heard experts saying that the Fed just HAD to act! They had to show that they are very concerned about the economy. I am afraid that the combination of the government’s inability to act and the Fed’s over-willingness to save the day underscores just what is wrong with our country. This has got to be the height of national irresponsibility. 

10 comments:

  1. It is hard to comment on such wisdom. We are F'd in street jargon. We have no economic plan, education plan or energy plan....no leadership and a lot of thinking that does not match up with the times or the "new economy". Our leaders are more interested in being re-elected. Why not? They have the best jobs in the nation. We are the dummies who keep electing them based the well spun claims.

    We go the downgrade because of this dysfunctional system not because of lack of wealth.

    Focus should be on jobs and not those spun up by giving out more stimulus. It took 25 years for the transition from the last of the industrial age to the information age where there is rapid technology change and requires a cultural change to keep up. Keeping up includes our education policies and system. It also includes being smarter about matching skills with jobs ...or even knowing what those skills should be.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks James -- you are right on about the jobs but unfortunately our President thinks the best way to increase jobs is to increase the duration of unemployment insurance and temporarily reduce the worker's share of payroll taxes....as you say, he is way off the mark.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lar, "way off the mark" isn't even close as a description of the Beloved Leader. He and his entire administration were out to lunch when they woke up. They are clueless.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Al, Thanks. I agree. He completely lost me when he made the speech on Monday. He is totally out of touch.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I completely agree with you that monetary policy is pretty much irrelevant to the mess we're in. Indeed, probably the most useful thing the Fed could do would be to try to damage the economy for a year or so to help make sure Obama doesn't get re-elected, since he's the real problem.

    I did wonder about this, though:

    "If our problems today have anything to do with monetary policy, they probably stem from too much outstanding money and the risk of higher inflation."

    Wouldn't higher inflation be a good thing? How else are we going to pay our debts? And wouldn't high inflation help divert saving away from government bonds and towards corporations?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks Eric,

    Higher inflation is never a good thing since it is inherently uncontrollable once it gets going. I fear that if inflation appears to be the vehicle for debt reduction this will trigger too much selling of US assets and make the economy worse. The old fashioned way -- spending less and only spending what you earn -- is the best way to reduce debt -- even if you are a sovereign today.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think academics have the best jobs in the world. Ironic that they should be the most critical of politicians who have the second best job in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks Robert. I think President Truman made it clear how he felt about some academicians when he requested a one-armed economist. If economists are not critical of politicians, then who gets the privilege?

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/larrykudlow/2011/08/11/more_jackson_hole_shock-and-awe

    Can we just bring back Greenspan? At least he has some creds.

    ReplyDelete