That sounds
pretty silly doesn’t it? But this is almost exactly what Ben Bernanke and the
press are saying about monetary policy. Last week a few members of the FOMC
were brazen enough to question when the Fed might begin pulling out some of the
zillions of dollars of reserves they pumped into the economy the last five
years. Has it really been five years Martha? Wasn’t the recession over in 2009?
Anyway, you
would have thought that Oliver had asked for more porridge. The markets had heart
attacks and TV anchors gazed at all of us with anguished faces. Pull out the
money??? We can’t pull out the money with France in a dither and with US
unemployment at 8%! Ben agrees and he assures us that he will know exactly when
to pull out all that money. And he will do it in a painless and happy way. Hey
guys did you hear that Ben pulled out the money and no one even noticed it. Man
that Ben is like the best eco-money surgeon.
He can pull trillions of dollars out of the system without anyone even
realizing it. He is better than Casper the friendly ghost.
So what is
going on here? Why is Ben Bernanke waiting to begin pulling the money plug? The
answer is that it is like Jason’s Ant Farm. When faced with a decision to
disappoint your child or save money for retirement, many people’s hearts are
tugged. Ben looks around and sees a lot of unemployed workers and he realizes
that the second he announces a policy to withdraw monetary stimulus, interest
rates will rise and jeopardize spending and economic expansion and along with
it employment. Surely when you compare that scenario to waiting a while to
remove the money, it seems more humane to leave the money in the system.
So why do
his colleagues on the FOMC want to start withdrawing stimulus now? Are they hard-hearted
fiends and vampires? Perhaps, but I think not.
They want to help unemployed workers too but like waiting until the last
minute to win the lottery to support you in old age – these Fed officials
believe that it is better for the Fed to start the process now – instead of
later. It is probably true that an announcement to reverse the course of policy of the last five years would result in a rational forecast that
interest rates will rise. That expectation alone can start interest rates
rising immediately. That doesn’t sound good. But keep in mind that short-term
interest rates are basically zero right now. EVERYONE knows this is a temporary
situation. The only real question is when they will rise and by how much.
Okay – so
rates are going to rise back to something more normal. But how much will they
rise? Expectations will drive rates up as soon as the announcement is made. But
then what? First, notice that a policy
to begin removing money when there is a ton of it out there might not disturb
money and credit markets very much. That is, banks are sitting on so much money
that they have plenty of it around for quite a while. Markets will not
immediately find money scarce. So this excess supply should help to slow and
hold down interest rate increases. Second, the economy is not exactly roaring
right now. When the economy surges ahead, this often creates soaring demand for
credit that can cause large increases in interest rates. Without a rapid
increase in US or global demand, we should not expect much pressure for
interest rates to rise. Third, much has to do with inflationary expectations.
That is, whenever we think inflation is going to rise in the future, these
increases are mirrored in interest rates.
The reason for pulling out the money today is to reduce expectations of future
inflation. So a policy to begin
gradually removing monetary stimulus ought to begin an orderly increase to
normal levels of interest rates – but one that won’t necessarily reduce
economic growth and employment gains.
The bigger
risk comes from waiting. By waiting the Fed continues its stimulation of the
economy and encourages bubbles. These bubbles are already impacting many prices
and encouraging increased financial risk taking. These bubbles raise our
expectations for inflation and raise the demand for money as a response to the
increase risk and uncertainty generated by not knowing when the policies will
change. We increasingly encourage
hostility from our trading partners as our surplus money seeks overseas
opportunities and reduces the competitiveness of their exports.
Of course
the timing problem is exacerbated by the Federal government who seems unable to
control future budget deficits. This means credit markets will have to digest
$1 trillion or more government bonds each year for the foreseeable future.
Normally interest rates would rise as private firms sell bonds that compete with the government
for precious private saving. The Fed’s aggressive purchasing of government bonds make it
possible for the government to finance its deficits without driving up interest
rates. Thus an expansionary monetary policy seems necessary to fund an
expansionary fiscal policy. If the government continues on this path it puts
upward pressure on interest rates. Clearly a reversal of both fiscal and
monetary policies is what we need right now.
The Fed’s decision to ease up would be very much aided by a prudent fiscal policy. But with or without the proper fiscal change, the Fed does us all a favor by doing the right thing and starting that right now. Waiting risks another bubble and another explosion.
The Fed’s decision to ease up would be very much aided by a prudent fiscal policy. But with or without the proper fiscal change, the Fed does us all a favor by doing the right thing and starting that right now. Waiting risks another bubble and another explosion.
Bubbles. We are the bubble economy. Does anyone work anymore or just play the market?
ReplyDeleteSeriously, pulling out the money that was used to fill the banks would mean that there was now competition for the funds and the entities who possessed the funds would have to set increasingly hihger interest rates as the new bar or norm for evaluating projects. Risk would increase an so would expectation of reward...remember Flip this House. So what is the next new thing or bubble(s) and where will the interest rate settle? That is an unknown with worse pressure than the current prospective homeowner wanting to close quick before the cost of borrowing surged upwards...and in that house of cards will jump upwards with help from every bubble speculator that is currently hiding under various rocks.
This is from FUZZY not from Larry.
ReplyDeleteFuzzy here.
Bubble, bubble, toil and trouble......
Hoot, as Lar said the pull out must be gradual....you did say that didn't you Lar, and if you did, I love it when you talk dirty! If Gentle Ben withdraws gently, the banks will still have more reserves than they can possibly dump in a short time. What we'll see is a gentle rise in inflation which, I believe, the fragile economy can tolerate. However, when have we ever done anything gradually with monetary policy. It's either all or nothing, and in the "all" case, there'll be a Mount St. Helens inflationary response. I tend to think Ol' Ben will kick the can some more and then handover the mess to his successor.
I've discovered that you can boil the frog slowly or microwave him. Either way, the frog's cooked.
Dear Fuzzy -- I was wondering if anyone would play fast and loose with the gradual pullout. Good work! As any cook will tell you, the speed in which you cook the frog will make a lot of difference so long as you are interested in taste. As for the extreme of monetary policy, we all remember 22% interest rates in 1980. That was not pleasant. A more gradual pull back in the late 1970s would have been much better.
DeleteH-m-m-m-m, guys. Lemme see if I get wut yer’all saying. LSD is subtly sending a tingle up yer libidos. Jimbo says the house of bubbles will implode or explode—either way it’s a naughty gang bang. The Fuzmeister is poetically and rhythmically espousing a gentle back and forth slow hand resulting in some kind of eruption while concluding with a post coitus reptilian delicacy.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, at the Tuna’s epicurean table tonight his better half informed him the economy is doin jez fine . . . house sales are up and so is the stock market. H-m-m-m-m, lemme see, here . . . the shadow inventory of underwater houses has yet to reveal, existing housing inventory is declining oh so slowly, new house starts have fits, first-time unemployment claims have averaged 325,000 plus since whenever and unemployment has leveled out at under 8% (despite Obummer’s numerous pivots to boost employment), the market tanked yesterday ‘cause the Cannolis’ election mimicked the U.S.’s 2012 indecisive election . . . and on and on and on. And, oh, yes . . . the economy, according to King Obummer, is going over the cliff next week unless the Rs cough up more taxes, thus pulling wanting more $$$ out of the private sector while Court Jester Ben pumps more $$$ into the thereof—or sloooowly, every so sloooowly—pulls it out. Gotta luv that in and out, herky-jerky stuff.
The result will be an economic orgasmic inflation followed by a deflationary post coitus Marlboro, whilst the hand gently flicks the ashes of the burning, smoldering remains of what could have been the most productive economy, society, and culture in Western history. Hip-hip-hooray for the circular firing squad in D.C. But, let’s not mourn too much for them, for they are only doing the bidding of the voters who pulled the blue lever. Hey, guys . . . ya know I jez had to get that in. Not to disappoint.
Do a Google search fοr 'survey scam' and you'll turn up thousands of results warning people about the lure of easy money just for taking online surveys. On this case, winning the lottery is all about incorporating all actions including all ideas to make up your want to come back true. However, you must realize that there'ѕ no guarаnteed ѕtrategy
ReplyDeletethat ωill yοu win in thаt lοttery.
Нeге іs mу ωeblog; lottery secrets