It is,
therefore, clear that bringing something back home is not always good or
desirable. And so it is with jobs. The
trouble is with the word in my title “Back”. Having a strong job market does
not necessarily mean bringing the jobs back. A strong job market and a healthy
economy is a very desirable thing and it is possible that bringing jobs back
might not be the best way to accomplish that.
I recently
read an article that explained that the US dollar’s role as a reserve currency
is our main employment problem. If the dollar was no longer the world’s key reserve
currency then jobs would come roaring back. How silly can you get?
The
rationale is something like this. Countries sit on a bunch of dollars. They are
nice to have around in the case that their government ruins their economy and
destroys the value of their own currency. This desire to have dollars,
therefore, leads to countries buying more dollars and raising the price of the
dollar. The latter induces people to buy fewer American goods and more Chinese,
Cuban, Estonian, and Vietnamese goods. If only they held fewer dollars, the
value of the dollar would fall and the world would orgy on American-made goods.
American workers would have so many jobs that they would dance their way
through life like Zorba on the beach.
Okay I got a
little sarcastic. Sorry. But it really is a silly theory. Does the reserve
currency story have some truth? Of course. But that does not mean it is very
important in the overall picture of exchange rates and where people like to buy
their goods and services. Take exchange rates first. Reserves are but one of
many things that impact the demand for US dollars. The value of the dollar
seesaws by the minute and by the month because of many key determinants.
For example,
global investors love to earn money and they look around for places to invest.
When America’s economy seems strong or when the Fed policy leads to juicier
bond or stock returns – folks all over the world sell their own currencies and
buy dollars so they can buy US assets and get richer. Interesting that good news in US financial
markets that raises the value of the dollar might be very important when it comes to
hurting exports of US goods and services. Solution – mess up the US economy so
it looks weak – that will help US exports of goods and services. I would not recommend
this.
The second
point is to think more broadly about why people trade goods across countries. Is
the exchange rate the only thing impacting trade? Of course not. When we make
decisions about sourcing goods we worry about such things as quality and price and
those two things depend on many factors. What technology is employed? What
design is used? How expensive is the labor? What is the shipping cost? How much do
firms have to pay in the way of taxes or how are their costs affected by
government regulations? How much does water and energy cost? And the list goes
on.
Like many
good stories, this one about bringing jobs back to America is more complicated
than some people make out. The reserve
currency gambit is silly because it takes one out of hundreds of factors and pretends
it is prominent. There is a simple way to look at all this. Americans
average somewhere around $60,000 income per year. To make American workers worth
that amount in a sustainable way, it makes no sense to compete with Vietnam on
low-skilled manufacturing or with any country that has an ability to make a
particular good or service better and cheaper than we can make it.
Does that
mean we give up? No. It means we use our considerable resources to make the
things we are the best at. It won’t be easy but we already do it all the time.
Our prowess in digital is amazing. We have new companies popping up like JD at a
tailgate party. We will need a smart and determined set of policies that
support that effort. We need to think how we reshape government resources and
incentives so they support an effort to be the very best at producing things that can generate good pay for many employees.
We also need to continue to press cases against cheaters. It is one
thing for the Rams to be tougher and smarter than Patriots – but if New England
cheats, then the Rams still might not win. If China or any other country cheats -- then it is harder for the rest of us to make gains.
Dear LSD. The prospect of replacing the dollar as the reserve currency is small despite recent reports/commentary of some countries using their own currencies to pay for trade and the IMF’s 2016 inclusion of the yuan in its basket of currencies that make up the Special Drawing Right. Without going into arcane detail a significant impediment to replacing the dollar is the untested long-term economic/political stability of the countries using the euro, yaun/renminbi, mark, franc, etc. It would take a major global eco/political disruption to dislodge the U.S. from its perch as the most reliable and stable country. I think the dollar is OK for a while . . . .
ReplyDeleteShould we have as a goal to bring yobz back to ‘merica? Shure, why not as long as the dollar remains the RC? . . . not RC cola.
Dearest Tuna,
DeleteI write a wonderful treatise on why jobs will not return and you simply allege that we should bring them back. Have you been chasing too many fish lately? Why is it a good idea to bring jobs back given the objections I raised above? By the way, Sanibel has a lot of lovely fish for a tuna.
Dear LSD. Me thinks you’re teasing me . . . tickl’n me behind my gills. 0-o-o-o-o, please stop. Bringing yobz back to good ol’ USA would have many benefits, aside the arcane issues of exchange rates, trade imbalances, reserve currency, etc. and despite six million U.S. job vacancies.
DeleteBring'un yobz back would boost econ growth, further reduce unemployment thus pressure wages to increase due to increased demand for labor, add to state/fed/Soc. Sec./Medicare income tax revenues, possibly repurpose vacant factories/buildings, move folkz off food stamps/welfare thus lowering transfer payments, etc. Competition for labor should/would/could? incentivize academia to graduate students with employable edukation thus strengthening the U.S. workforce for the future (mighty big assumption given academia’s Marxist bias :)). Increased tax revenues could be used to reduce state/fed debt and provide moola for infrastructure. Increased wages could help reduce the wage/wealth gap and improve the standard of living. An overall boost to prosperity ‘n lift’n all boats. Soundz like a good plan, Stan . . . despite the objections raised.
0-o-o-o-o-o, stop . . . . please stop.
Oh you sweet hunky tuna. I love your paragraph filled with optimistic hopes about the benefits of bringing jobs back. But dearest Tuna of the Sea -- all that might be true but even if you brought back every single job, it wouldn't be enough to fill the smallest shrimp bucket.
DeleteBut my main point in the post is not that there is no economic benefit from bringing jobs back. My point in the post is that they are not coming back. There are good economic reasons for why most of the jobs left.
Low to middle skilled manufacturing jobs are not coming back. The companies involved would get killed by competition. Companies with critical global supply chains are not bringing those jobs back or they will be killed by competition.
Smart Tunas do not swim in the red tide. Smart firms will not bring these jobs back to the USA.
Dear LSD. The Tuna doesn’t want to beat a dead scallop and doesn’t want to bore your loyal followers with mundane detail showing that reshoring is occurring. Rather, here are two links reporting on reshoring. Should you and your loyalists want to indulge:
Deletehttps://www.industryweek.com/economy/reshoring-rise-what-it-means-trade-debate
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2018/06/28/manufacturers-bringing-most-jobs-back-to-america/36438051/ -- reports on 16 manufacturers who are reshoring.
Yum . . . luv those live scallops!
You want to see what you want to see. The first article fudges by adding foreign investments to reshoring. Doesn't break it down. And the number of 170,000 jobs is pretty tiny compared to anything except Peter's bank account. Its a grain in the sand. The second article is even less supportive of the bring it home story since they shows vividly the wide number of factors that promote a manufacturing location in the USA. Harley Davidson by the way is struggling right now. Reshoring might be occurring but the data says it is more of a puddle than a tidal wave -- and that's no place for a nice Tuna.
Delete