Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Debt Bomb

Thanks to alert blog-buddy Johnny H the General, I saw this article that quoted our Federal Reserve Chairman Powell warning that government deficits are not a good thing: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/10/fed-chairman-powell-says-he-is-very-worried-about-growing-amount-of-us-debt.html

In reading that article and trying to keep up with this ongoing saga called government, I decided that I should try to provide some background. Like making a perfect Old Fashioned, this discussion of government debt and deficits can be daunting. I was taking a poll in a Sanibel haunt last night and learned from a gentle person teetering on his stool that a perfect Old Fashioned had to have sugar in it. So, of course, that sent me into professor mode, and I almost finished my lecture by midnight.

Let’s begin at the beginning. A government deficit occurs whenever the government spends more than it takes in taxes. Like you, the government might spend more than it earns in a given month. The government has a deficit. You have an unpaid charge on your Visa bill. Assuming you never did such things in the past, that deficit now means you have a debt. You owe the credit card company. The government facilitates its debt by selling a government bond to you, me, or Young Jin. 

Next month, if you don’t have as many JDs and manage to keep your spending below your income, you might have a surplus that you can use to payoff your debt. The debt went up and then the debt went down.

The trouble comes when you do not have a surplus. That is, every month you spend more than you earn. The debt increases every month by the amount of the deficit. This is easily solved when the mafia sends a well-dressed representative to your house and removes your collection of authentic German nutcrackers.

In the case of the government, the solution is a bit more complicated. Our national debt in the USA is about $20-something trillion. Yes, Tuna, trillion is a very big number. We are a large and wealthy country, so we seem to be able to handle that debt. No sweat. That debt is held by people both inside and outside the USA. So long as they get their monthly interest payments, they are cool.

What our Fed Chair was saying in his article is that two contingencies worry him. First, his own Federal Reserve buddies are engaged in a project of raising interest rates. This means that the club we call government (I refuse to capitalize that word) is going to have to pay even more dollars every month to bondholders. The second worry is that the USA economy might go into a recession. Just like shining our shoes, recessions tend to come now and then. When a recession comes, it reduces our national income, and we are less rich and less able to pay off our debts.

But you say, Balderdash! We are a rich and powerful country. So what if we have a little bitty recession and interest rates go up a smidge? Well, keep saying that. Ask your Greek friends or maybe your Venezuelan friends what happens when the world decides that you might not pay your lenders. You say, Balderdash again! Those are foreign places, not the USA.

Mr. Powell says he is not convinced it makes a difference. Once we look vulnerable, people will sell US bonds like hotcakes at Denny’s on a Tuesday night. Once the door is opened a crack, all hell will break loose. You don't want to be the last person holding a worthless US government bond! US interest rates will soar, the stock market will crumble, and the value of the dollar will be lower than scum on a snail’s belly.

The Fed will eventually raise interest rates to a normal level. A recession will eventually hit. In the meantime, our government is whistling Dixie. What a bunch of morons. Reduce the deficit dudes. You don’t have a lot of time. Reduce it.

15 comments:

  1. On the business outlook panel I've been forecasting/warning of the problems caused by the growing US debt. The audience usually sighs and we move on. Maybe one guy will ask about problems caused by debt. In the 2016 and 2018 elections debt was about as important as the size of the nose of Sacagawea coin.
    We will need to be hammered by creditors before anyone cares.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mr Yachts,

      It reminds me of the joke about the guy who falls off the top of a tall building. As he is speeding downward at brake neck speed someone leans out a third floor window and asks -- How's is going? He replies -- Fine so far.

      Delete
    2. The above should read -- How is it going?

      Delete
  2. Seems to me that we also continue to hide behind the vagueness that accompanies terms like "Short term", "Near Term", and "Long Term". Everyone always agrees that there are problems in the long term even when we don't define what problem we are discussing. Similarly, all downside soothsayers hide behind the notion that while the sky is falling, the near term is probably OK. So, without really knowing time lines, most of the discussion is pretty empty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's true Ed. But it is also the constant nature of things that there are looming risks aside a brisk economy. That does not make the risks any less dangerous and it should not prevent people from trying to avert those risks. We never know the timelines. We always have to make judgments about avoiding the worst cases in an uncertain future. History is full of examples of countries that ignored risks associated with too much government debt to their peril.

      Delete
  3. I completely concur that the long term debt is issue is a significant problem. My sense, however, is that what will cause the US Economy to tumble will be something tangential, e.g when world markets begin to doubt whether the concept of "full faith and credit" can be relied upon during cycles of fairly violent change. Historically, we have been able to weather a lot because of the fundamental belief in who we are and how we are governed. When, however, a major party ( think GOP) abandons a major belief like the importance of controlling debt load, one has to wonder whether markets should continue to trust in a flip- flop mentality--even in the short term.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agreed. Its sort of like having a very unhealthy life style. It might be fun to indulge but in doing so you risk serious damage when you get a cold or a fever. In one case the bacteria kills a guy -- in the other it has little effect. Having less debt makes a country more resilient to external shocks of all kinds.

      Delete
  4. Dear LSD. Not only is the govomit whistling Dixie it’s also tip-toeing past the graveyard. The debt/deficit is a time bomb, the fuse is lit, and there ain't nobody willing to snuff it out.

    Here’s another slant to the downside of our deficit/debt. As China, Russia, Iran, Turkey, and the EU pursue agreements to abandon the U.S. dollar as the basis for payment in their trade agreements the status of the dollar as the reserve currency will diminish. If the dollar’s value decreases a lot the interest cost to U.S. taxpayers will greatly exceed the already $364 billion annual interest payment budgeted for FY 2019. That $billion a day buys a lot of JD. It’s not just the U.S. deficit/debt as an issue: U.S. political and economic stability is also an issue. While we’re enjoying a pretty good economy now, our politic polarization and international trade uncertainty could further other nations’ motivation to replace the dollar as the reserve currency. If/when that happens our deficit/debt will be a double-whammy—the higher interest cost will crush us. Not recession—depression—that’s depressing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great point Tuna. I had some excellent scallops last night, I hope you don't mind. Anyway, while your point is spot on and I have not heard anyone discuss that point -- it still remains a probability and not a sure thing that countries will use the dollar less for reserves. Much depends on US stability versus the stability of the EU, Japan, etc. So long as the US is the second dumbest kid on the block -- the US will be spared a flight from the dollar. But once we become the first, Katie bar the door. I will be discussion that point more in next week's edition.

      Delete
    2. Likely the Sanibel scallops = mighty fine juicy—I enjoy a couple now and then when I’m cruising between the sandbanks and about 50 meters. It’s an easy catch as they don’t swim that fast.

      Delete
    3. You are a fine Tuna. And you have good taste too.

      Delete
    4. I am late to this blog (thank you Dr. Davidson. But does LSD refer to Dr. Davidson's youthful activities, and is Tuna really Bill Parcells? The NY Giants could really use him. JML, Ph.D, Economics UNC '77

      Delete
    5. Dear Jesse, Tuna remains confidential but I can tell you he once played linebacker on a state championship high school team. That explains his leaky brain.:-) When my mother named me Lawrence Stuart Davidson back before underware was invented, she never knew what my initials would amount to.

      Delete
  5. The very large pachyderm in the conservatory is 535 lawyers on the rather prominent hill in Washington DC who give a crap about debt. Well, there may be a couple of MDs in that group, but they won't stop spending as long as we keep electing them to give us stuff. What we need is to move to a zero-based budget scheme where cuts aren't disguised as just slowing the growth in social programs. Who says "Balderdash" anymore?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who is going to vote for the zero-based scheme? Balderdash!

      Delete