This article was nationally syndicated by Tribune News Service/Tribune Content Agency and appeared in newspapers across the United States.
American free-market capitalism has
generated the greatest economic growth the world has ever seen. At the core of
its brilliance is its ability to create incentives to produce solutions to
problems and to distribute those solutions worldwide. In doing so, it has paved
the way for tremendous gains in efficiency and productivity while lifting
millions of people out of poverty.
When discussing its benefits, the late author
and philosopher Michael Novak said: “No other system so rapidly raises up the
living standards of the poor, so thoroughly improves the conditions of life, or
generates greater social wealth and distributes it more broadly. In the long
competition of the last 100 years, neither socialist nor third-world
experiments have performed as well in improving the lot of common people.”
For centuries, the American experiment has
embraced free-market capitalism along with the rule of law, separation of
church and state, entrepreneurialism, balance of power, the welcoming of
immigrants, and a brilliant Constitution. This “secret sauce” has created a
stable environment encouraging entrepreneurs to take risks and empowering
people to unleash their creativity to achieve their dreams.
After dozens of speaking engagements in Mexico in the early
1990s, I found that many in the audience either had an American passport or
badly wanted one. When I crossed through Checkpoint Charlie into
East Berlin as the Berlin Wall was coming down, I was told by countless East
Germans of their wish to move to the United States to seek a better life. And
when visiting China, young Chinese
often tell me of their desire to study in America or permanently move here.
What
draws so many people to the United States? America’s “secret sauce” continues
to provide tremendous advantages that few other countries can.
However, due to flaws revealed during the Great
Recession that began in 2008 and throughout its slow and uneven recovery, many Americans
began to question the credibility of our economic model.
In efforts to help those struggling to get ahead
and create greater economic opportunities for all, some elected officials are advocating
left-leaning (some would say “socialist”) policies that give the state too much
decision-making authority. And herein lies the problem.
Stated
by author John Steele Gordon, “Politicians can only make political decisions,
not economic ones. They are, after all, first and foremost in the re-election
business. Because of the need to be re-elected, politicians are always likely
to have a short-term bias.”
Additionally, government service providers lack
competition, a primary factor that makes capitalism so successful, and have less
incentive to become more efficient, productive, innovative, and accountable. If
left unchecked, economic decisions made by the market today could become
decisions made by policymakers tomorrow who assume they know better.
Michael Novak also stressed that checks and
balances are to the political order what competition is to capitalism. China,
for example, does not have a system of checks and balances, nor one that
promotes competition. As a result, its brand of one-party capitalism is undergoing
difficulties that are likely to become more severe in the years ahead.
Other examples where the state substituted its
decision-making ability for that of the market include the former Soviet Union,
North Korea, and Venezuela — all failed states.
On the other hand, the American system of capitalism
is far from perfect.
Some argue that our system is in a constant
struggle to achieve a balance between the wealthiest and the rest, but in
recent years has shifted too much power to the top, creating greater inequality.
Others assert that crony capitalism, which exists when competition is unfairly limited,
is too pervasive. And still others claim that their ability to reach the middle
class has become nearly impossible.
In an effort to improve economic outcomes
for all Americans, it’s essential to continually improve our system of free-market
capitalism — not move
toward a more socialist-like model that empowers politicians to make decisions that
should be made by the market.
Free-market capitalism is responsible for
improving the living standards of millions or even billions of people around
the world. It’s also responsible for creating the wealth that, through taxation,
supports essential government services, social programs, and safety nets.
Seeking the right balance between the
market and the state is critical. But in the process let’s be sure to improve
America’s “secret sauce,” not poison it.
I am posting this for avid reader Ricky A.
ReplyDeleteI wrote this nice response to post and then it wouldn't take it. I don't even want to write it all again. But my highlights are, the free market doesn't give me clean air or water. In fact, the free market with free speech from citizens united (a misnomer itself) gives me dismantled regulations and weak enforcement. Propaganda experts like Manzella use truths to gloss over the holes in our ship. Every challenge to our existing system gets labeled as "socialist" by his type. Trump was correct. "America will never be a socialist country". But does every tax and every regulation have to be labeled "socialism". Let's not be blind to the problems in our system.
Dear LSD. Manzella’s article is timely given the current reporting of ‘democratic socialism’ vs. capitalism. That many young folks are reported to favor some form of socialism over our current system is troubling and given the income disparity and gaps between job vacancies and abundant labor supply their disillusionment is understandable. Those conditions are not the fault of our current economic system. The flaws to which he refers were caused by Democrat-passed legislation that encouraged reckless mortgage lending and feckless oversight of FANNIE-FREDDIE and of the secondary bond market—all govomit-related actions (or inactions). The only aspect of the Great Recession with private-sector (aka capitalism) finger prints were the big banks that (due to the enabling D-passed legislation) sold toxic bundled mortgages: They failed in their due diligence to audit them. Had Ds not facilitated the liberalization of traditional lending/credit guidelines the GR would not have happened. So, not a failure of capitalism but of govomit. Yes, our economic system is not perfect but still the best the world has to offer.
ReplyDeleteAdditionally, the income/wealth gap and job availability/labor supply gap is due to the failure of govomit and academia to anticipate curriculum needed to fulfill the educational/skills requirements precipitated by technological changes and the shift from industrial to a service economy. Not a failure of capitalism. A last poke at academia—its liberal bias in teaching/educating no doubt is a factor in the recent chatter about socialism vs. capitalism.
Kudos to Manzella.
Thanks Tuna. As always your perspicacity rings true. It's too bad that more of our more liberal friends don't like to join in the fray here. I am sure there are many things you say that they would take issue with. So let's watch and see if anyone wants to take you on.
DeleteI really like Tuna's point about academia being flat footed regarding the curriculum needed to market ones self to the current market conditions. For wealth gaps to decrease and capitalistic systems to work at full capability you need more buy in bottom to top. Which means less waste.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Unknown. Tunas are not known to be classy but since they attend school they do tend to absorb some modicum of classical theory of economics, particularly that of A. Smith’s free hand of individual’s decisions to buy or not certain stuff. In Tuna School we learn’d that an edukat’d electorate (refer to Federalist Papers) is best for a republic—not to be confused with a democracy—is the best foundation to preserve the former. That our educkational system is not edukat’n folks in basic civics/econ stuff is a failure. That’s not a failure of capitalism but a failure of Rs comprising and allowing socialist oriented folkz to infiltrate academia and to expand govomit over the private sector. That academia is not edukat’n folkz in civics/econ lays the seeds to destroying the fine country Manzella defendz. Tiz a sad day in ‘merica.
DeleteThese are times that try men’s souls . . . redu.