Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Don’t Underestimate Free-Market Capitalism by Guest Blogger John Manzella

John Manzella, founder of the ManzellaReport.com, is an author, speaker, and nationally syndicated columnist on global business, emerging risks, and economic trends. To contact him, visit www.JohnManzella.com.

This article was nationally syndicated by Tribune News Service/Tribune Content Agency and appeared in newspapers across the United States.


American free-market capitalism has generated the greatest economic growth the world has ever seen. At the core of its brilliance is its ability to create incentives to produce solutions to problems and to distribute those solutions worldwide. In doing so, it has paved the way for tremendous gains in efficiency and productivity while lifting millions of people out of poverty.

When discussing its benefits, the late author and philosopher Michael Novak said: “No other system so rapidly raises up the living standards of the poor, so thoroughly improves the conditions of life, or generates greater social wealth and distributes it more broadly. In the long competition of the last 100 years, neither socialist nor third-world experiments have performed as well in improving the lot of common people.”

For centuries, the American experiment has embraced free-market capitalism along with the rule of law, separation of church and state, entrepreneurialism, balance of power, the welcoming of immigrants, and a brilliant Constitution. This “secret sauce” has created a stable environment encouraging entrepreneurs to take risks and empowering people to unleash their creativity to achieve their dreams.

After dozens of speaking engagements in Mexico in the early 1990s, I found that many in the audience either had an American passport or badly wanted one. When I crossed through Checkpoint Charlie into East Berlin as the Berlin Wall was coming down, I was told by countless East Germans of their wish to move to the United States to seek a better life. And when visiting China, young Chinese often tell me of their desire to study in America or permanently move here.

What draws so many people to the United States? America’s “secret sauce” continues to provide tremendous advantages that few other countries can.

However, due to flaws revealed during the Great Recession that began in 2008 and throughout its slow and uneven recovery, many Americans began to question the credibility of our economic model.

In efforts to help those struggling to get ahead and create greater economic opportunities for all, some elected officials are advocating left-leaning (some would say “socialist”) policies that give the state too much decision-making authority. And herein lies the problem.

Stated by author John Steele Gordon, “Politicians can only make political decisions, not economic ones. They are, after all, first and foremost in the re-election business. Because of the need to be re-elected, politicians are always likely to have a short-term bias.”

Additionally, government service providers lack competition, a primary factor that makes capitalism so successful, and have less incentive to become more efficient, productive, innovative, and accountable. If left unchecked, economic decisions made by the market today could become decisions made by policymakers tomorrow who assume they know better.

Michael Novak also stressed that checks and balances are to the political order what competition is to capitalism. China, for example, does not have a system of checks and balances, nor one that promotes competition. As a result, its brand of one-party capitalism is undergoing difficulties that are likely to become more severe in the years ahead.

Other examples where the state substituted its decision-making ability for that of the market include the former Soviet Union, North Korea, and Venezuela — all failed states.

On the other hand, the American system of capitalism is far from perfect.

Some argue that our system is in a constant struggle to achieve a balance between the wealthiest and the rest, but in recent years has shifted too much power to the top, creating greater inequality. Others assert that crony capitalism, which exists when competition is unfairly limited, is too pervasive. And still others claim that their ability to reach the middle class has become nearly impossible.

In an effort to improve economic outcomes for all Americans, it’s essential to continually improve our system of free-market capitalism — not move toward a more socialist-like model that empowers politicians to make decisions that should be made by the market.

Free-market capitalism is responsible for improving the living standards of millions or even billions of people around the world. It’s also responsible for creating the wealth that, through taxation, supports essential government services, social programs, and safety nets.

Seeking the right balance between the market and the state is critical. But in the process let’s be sure to improve America’s “secret sauce,” not poison it.





5 comments:

  1. I am posting this for avid reader Ricky A.

    I wrote this nice response to post and then it wouldn't take it. I don't even want to write it all again. But my highlights are, the free market doesn't give me clean air or water. In fact, the free market with free speech from citizens united (a misnomer itself) gives me dismantled regulations and weak enforcement. Propaganda experts like Manzella use truths to gloss over the holes in our ship. Every challenge to our existing system gets labeled as "socialist" by his type. Trump was correct. "America will never be a socialist country". But does every tax and every regulation have to be labeled "socialism". Let's not be blind to the problems in our system.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear LSD. Manzella’s article is timely given the current reporting of ‘democratic socialism’ vs. capitalism. That many young folks are reported to favor some form of socialism over our current system is troubling and given the income disparity and gaps between job vacancies and abundant labor supply their disillusionment is understandable. Those conditions are not the fault of our current economic system. The flaws to which he refers were caused by Democrat-passed legislation that encouraged reckless mortgage lending and feckless oversight of FANNIE-FREDDIE and of the secondary bond market—all govomit-related actions (or inactions). The only aspect of the Great Recession with private-sector (aka capitalism) finger prints were the big banks that (due to the enabling D-passed legislation) sold toxic bundled mortgages: They failed in their due diligence to audit them. Had Ds not facilitated the liberalization of traditional lending/credit guidelines the GR would not have happened. So, not a failure of capitalism but of govomit. Yes, our economic system is not perfect but still the best the world has to offer.

    Additionally, the income/wealth gap and job availability/labor supply gap is due to the failure of govomit and academia to anticipate curriculum needed to fulfill the educational/skills requirements precipitated by technological changes and the shift from industrial to a service economy. Not a failure of capitalism. A last poke at academia—its liberal bias in teaching/educating no doubt is a factor in the recent chatter about socialism vs. capitalism.

    Kudos to Manzella.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Tuna. As always your perspicacity rings true. It's too bad that more of our more liberal friends don't like to join in the fray here. I am sure there are many things you say that they would take issue with. So let's watch and see if anyone wants to take you on.

      Delete
  3. I really like Tuna's point about academia being flat footed regarding the curriculum needed to market ones self to the current market conditions. For wealth gaps to decrease and capitalistic systems to work at full capability you need more buy in bottom to top. Which means less waste.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Unknown. Tunas are not known to be classy but since they attend school they do tend to absorb some modicum of classical theory of economics, particularly that of A. Smith’s free hand of individual’s decisions to buy or not certain stuff. In Tuna School we learn’d that an edukat’d electorate (refer to Federalist Papers) is best for a republic—not to be confused with a democracy—is the best foundation to preserve the former. That our educkational system is not edukat’n folks in basic civics/econ stuff is a failure. That’s not a failure of capitalism but a failure of Rs comprising and allowing socialist oriented folkz to infiltrate academia and to expand govomit over the private sector. That academia is not edukat’n folkz in civics/econ lays the seeds to destroying the fine country Manzella defendz. Tiz a sad day in ‘merica.

      These are times that try men’s souls . . . redu.

      Delete