Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Don’t Open that Gift if from Obama, Reid and Boehner!


The political debate in the USA over the extension of payroll tax cuts and the unemployment benefits (Extensions) is as hot as it is wrong-headed. It’s like two caged female dogs in heat. They both have incredible passion but they have no real ability to make the transaction work. Please no angry letters from dog lovers or my lesbian relatives and friends. No insult is intended.

Anyway, this Extensions fiasco reveals what is so wrong with politics now. Consider first that both parties seem to agree that the extensions are necessary.  They disagree about how to pay for them but they seem to say over and over and over and over and over – getting irritated? – and over that they want to extend the cuts but the extensions must be paid for. The guys wearing stripes think the rich should pay for them while the guys in the polka dots believe it has to come out of other spending.

Like the two dogs in heat, this dog won’t hunt. That’s not the metaphor I was after but I think you know what I mean.  Both sides seem to agree that without these extensions, the US economy is going to go careening off the ends of the earth.  Like driving on the right and eating foot-long chili dogs with ROC-CO-COLA, one cannot question the validity of this truth.  Either we do the EXTENSIONS or the US economy is going to slide head-first into the outer atmosphere.

But we do drive on the left on one-way streets and we sometimes eat foot-long Philadelphia Steak and Cheese sandwiches, so it might be possible to think a teeny-weeny little bit about what might happen if we did not do the extensions. Will the US really slide off the planet? First and foremost it is possible that if we did not make these extensions we would find that US government and other bonds would increase in value. The very thought of increasing government spending right now in a time of huge government deficits could be taken as another sign that the US government cannot govern. This would be true whether or not we enact means to pay for these Extensions. Notice where we are today. It is not yesterday it is today. Today we have failed yet another time to do anything about a solution for government debt and deficits. We can't even find a solution for next year's budget. Not only did the special committee not come to a decision, but now we are being told that the so-called automatic cuts are going to be undone. So let’s be honest here—in financial terms we are looking like the guy who applies for his tenth credit card after maxing out the other nine.

Okay – it’s just another $100 billion or so. To some it seems like nothing. But they are living in yesterday. Yesterday was when love was such an easy game to play. Now I need a place to hide away. Oh yesterday came suddenly. Anyway, the Beatles were right-on in many ways. $110 billion three years ago might have been okay. But now we are on our 10th credit card. Pass these extensions with or without a tax on the rich and the credit markets are going to chew up our bonds and precious dollar as if they were a male dog coming between those females in heat.

What that means is that interest rates will soar, net worth will decline, and spending will come to a halt. Some of you will say it is worth taking the risk. You will say that by not doing the Extensions we have two major sure-thing problems – the average family will lose income per month and those families will curtail their spending. You will conclude that stopping the extensions, then, is both unfair to the average family and will lead to reductions in national spending.

But let’s put these two points together. Let’s suppose that the average family understands that when financial markets look down their collective snoot at the US demand for a 10th credit card, all hell will break out. Let’s suppose this makes the average employed or unemployed worker worry even more worried about the economy. I am guessing that those workers will not readily part with their extension money. They will become even more judicious about how they spend because they need to make sure they continue to have some spending power in the future – as this stupid economic policy makes sure the economy stays weak for a long, long time. Notice that the extension plan does two things – (1) it initially gives more income to some Americans but they will prudently reduce their spending anyway; and (2) it creates a gigantic financial disturbance that will reduce even more spending by all Americans.

So call me insensitive if you want. But the fact that both parties are saying we need these Extensions is exactly the reason you should believe we don’t. Do you really believe these guys? They are continuing to do what they have been doing for years --- avoid the real solutions and pander to people who they think are easily fooled – you and me. Can you imagine what you will get when a smiling trio of Obama, Reed, and Boehner hand you your Christmas gift. I suggest you leave it on the ground and run like hell!

It seems to me that we would all be better-off without this cut...or more succinctly, without this cut in isolation. What we really need is an overall solution for the debt/deficit/growth issues. The special committee failed but Congress could do it tomorrow. Part of that overall solution could include these Extensions but in a responsible fashion whose goal is to deal with deficit/debt/growth.

13 comments:

  1. Perfesser, you have once again hit the nail on the head. The extension is best swept into the dust bin. I would almost say that in this case it would be better to do nothing....something at which our Congress seems to be very adept...than to tangle with this tar baby. It lives in the same kennel as the "unemployment benefit extension" dog. 99 weeks! That's almost a year in a dog's age! Most studies conclude that all that one did was keep people out of the job-search market...and how did we "pay" for that?

    The "tax the rich to pay for the extension" ploy is like a small child banging on that stupid drum you gave him for Christmas. You can tax them at 100% and still not have enough to pay the bills. The only solution is to cut spending. Sure, it'll hurt, and that's what the House and Senate are afraid of. They want a solution that doesn't hurt anybody. FOOLS! My mom told me before she poured iodine on my scraped knee, "This won't hurt." I believed her...once. After that, I knew she was lying. But I also knew that the pain would go away and the scrape would heal faster than if she did nothing. The government has lied to me too many times for me to believe anything that comes from inside the Beltway. Now, I'd like for them to stop lying and just hurt me with something that'll heal the problem eventually. AS "they" said in Nam, "Nebber happen, G.I."

    ReplyDelete
  2. Big Al,

    Thanks! I may not be as extreme as you. I understand where you are coming from but I do think that pulling the rug out from under this economy too fast could prove to be self-destructive. If we had a real medium-term restructuring it might be possible to wean the economy from these props gradually. But alas, the boys and girls in DC cannot be trusted to do the medium term remedy so there is no way the extensions will work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Government does spin stuff to fit their purposes..after all it is their game. They surely crushed the free market system with their
    'save us from the recession
    ' stimulus plan and some of the bail outs....not to mention the fixed 000% interest rate. Can they be trusted to do anything but serve themselves? I do not think so...at least not as a majority.

    Then again they seem to project a total ignorance of the private sector and are arrogant about the power they have..so what is new?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Mr. LSD. Yeah, just another version of “patchwork Orange.” Same ol, same ol . . . . Ds want to give away money to keep their constituencies (and keep the Prez in office . . . ‘cept’n he say he wants a year extension? go fig . . . .) and the Rs want more time that will (allegedly, hopefully) provide some certainty . . . . and avoid anudder confrontation in two months. Kudos to the Rs, though for bundl’n the pipeline to the deal. BUT, both Ds/Rs are wrong to agree to any extension of the payroll tax cut ‘cause it’ll have to be paid for out of general revenue/income tax years down the road when Soc. Sec. really, really needs the $$$$. What a quintessential example of borrowing from Petey to pay Pauly. BUT, the Rs are keen to force Oummer’s hand on the pipeline.

    As said many times, places before . . . nutt’n happens til Nov. ’12 particularly if the Rs win the trifecta.

    ReplyDelete
  5. James and Charles -- thanks! Seems strange with all the crazy stuff going on in Europe with respect to sovereign debt, we in the US seem to think we are bullet-proof. We seem to think we can keep raising debt without consequence. To them whether it is social security or anything else it is okay to keep adding debt. The day is going to come and we are not going to like it. Maybe the IMF will bail us out when that happens. Ho Ho Ho

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. LSD. Thank for the encouraging words . . . . although they’re written on the wind. RE: the IMF bailing us out. As we are (I think) the largest contributor (dupe) to the IMF that is tantamount to us bailing us out. Keep your fingers crossed for the trifecta in Nov.’12.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Charles -- Glad you caught my point -- the IMF is mostly us. I don't think we will be bailing out us. It could be pretty ugly.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Lar,
    To the Extensions you say No! No! No! No! No! - Well, O.K. but in a responsible fashion.
    Lar - take a stand - yea or nay.
    Good for America or bad for America? I want the truth.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UXoNE14U_zM

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Anon,

    If you want the truth you should go to your clergy. No stand necessary. It is sort of like this. I can be against irresponsible drinking and still enjoy my JD. I see nothing inconsistent. This Extension by itself is dead wrong. If part of a sensible plan, it might be okay. Good luck with that truth thing.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 40 bucks a month for a 2-month extension? Is that what all this hooha was about? 80 freakin' dollars? I know American voters are easy, but are we really that easy?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Big Al,

    It shows to me how weak-kneed our Republican leadership is. Seems to me that the Ds gave them a wonderful opportunity. Imagine that the Ds were going to let taxes go up on all these people because the Ds would not agreed to a whole one year extension. As you say, the Ds got these people $80 instead of $1000 or more. The Rs were trying to get them MORE money. And yet, the Rs looked like the bad guys -- and they still do. We need fewer morons in the Republican party.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Actually, according to the MSM, the R's are always wrong and cause all of the problems. One big gotcha was that Congressman Ohmert(?)R-TX, proposed a payroll tax holiday over a year ago, and the D's brought it up and threw it in their faces....kinda like John Kerry's ("I served in Vietnam")"I voted for it before I voted against it." Even IF the Republicans had brains, the media wouldn't give them credit for it.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Al,

    I agree that the press is very biased but I do think in this particular case of the extension the Rs did not take advantage of a ripe opportunity.

    Larry

    ReplyDelete