Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Good Policy and Employment Growth in the USA


Hey Pete isn’t it a pity that you can’t run the mile in eight minutes.  Yes, Pete said, but I am happy to be walking after that hip operation last month.  But the surgeon said you would be as good as new in a couple of weeks. Yes, and the surgeon needed a new hot tub cover too. Anyway, despite worries that the US economy is not improving fast enough to bring us back to normal, the Labor Department release last Friday was heartening and suggests further improvement. The payroll survey revised upward job growth in October and reported an increase in jobs for November of 120,000. The companion and broader household employment survey showed employment growing by 278,000 jobs. The unemployment rate fell below 9% to 8.6% as well.

In terms of the overall economy, this is a bit like Pete being able to walk a mile but it is still a ways from his normal mile run. The real issue today is one of false expectations. Activist politicians and economists wanted us all to believe that that their hocus pocus policies would have us running faster much quicker than was really possible. They are just now admitting that the global crisis was larger and deeper than first described – and will take longer than normal to heal.  So while we won’t do a back flip over the recent report, the truth is that the US economy seems to be on the mend.

One of my colleagues – let’s call him Joe since that is actually his name – pointed out to me as I was busting a gut trying to do three consecutive push-ups at the gym – that Europe was at it again. All the news last week was about a possible new compromise that would save the euro, Europe, and seals. But Joe pointed out that every time the EU seems on the verge of an agreement, Merkel and Sarkozy once again decide they are going to re-enact the economic equivalent to World War II.  Merkel wants Europeans to behave more like the Swiss – Sarkozy wants them to act more like Zorba.  Maybe Merkozy could come together and agree that Europeans should act more like the Dutch.  The Dutch are very conservative, save parts of their paychecks each month, smoke dope in Turtle Bars, and generally enjoy life as they ride around the town square on 300 pound 25 year-old bicycles that were given to them by their grandparents. They also say things like Als tublieft and debankt.

Before I go much farther I just wanted to tell you that I have not had sex with any sports coaches or Herman Cain. I do recall several times in high school when my coach said that if I didn’t play better he was going to put his size 16 High Top Converse All Star up my youknowwhat. But that is the closest I came to sex with coaches or politicians.

Financial markets want to see real solutions to our global financial problems. It seems worth thinking about that if the EU and the US were to fashion reasonable compromises that these markets would  be utterly delighted and increase further, consumers would feel wealthier, banking bottlenecks would be relieved, and the world economy could get back to an 8 minute mile. If I was a US politician up for re-election next year I would think about the political payoff to finding a real solution. The payoff to good policy choices has never been stronger. I would worry a lot, however, that if the EU actually does fashion a decent compromise while US government officials continue to approximate the monkey cage at the zoo, the political cost could be quite heavy. Our politicians will look even dumber than the monkeys if they are the only ones to let the milk spoil.

I keep saying words like – real solution.  It is possible that the Europeans and US politicians might come to some agreement or compromise that was not a real solution – and I am NOT advocating that. The room for real solutions, however, is quite ample. For those nuts who read me regularly, you may find this next part redundant but a compromise does not necessarily mean we sell our souls to Bobby Knight. A compromise recognizes that you cannot get exactly what you want but you do not have to give up on your basic principles. It is sort of like me when I agree to participate in our household’s Christmas decoration activities. As a relative to the famous Grinch and the son of two unreligious Jews, I don’t love the idea of spending hours putting together manger scenes, Christmas villages, and lifting a 900 pounds Santa out of the basement. But I do it anyway because I know two things. First, Betty will buy me some really nice Christmas presents. Second, my kids will buy me expensive bourbon.  So it is a good compromise.

A reasonable fiscal package in the US would recognize that housing and finance are the source of our current problems and need to be addressed. This  would entail dealing with the housing default overhang in a way that recognizes the difference between those who might realistically be able to repay with some contract adjustment – and those who might be able to repay but only if they won the top prize in the lottery. A real solution would also put us on a path toward smaller debts and deficits though recognizing that stimulus cannot be withdrawn too fast. A plan to begin reducing government stimulus but at a pace that accelerates over time could be designed by economists.  Should the US Congress come up with something that seriously addresses these two issues, incumbents could laugh their way back to their usual payola and corruption in 2012.

In summary, things in the USA are not as alarming as some people say but are not as good as they could be. We are on the mend from a serious illness but we need to keep following the doctor’s orders. The time for alarm and extreme policies has passed. Even small changes in the right direction can and will have great impacts on wealth, confidence, economic growth and employment. Politicians have much to gain by doing the right things. They do not realize how much they will personally lose if they continue to fritter away time and voter patience. 

10 comments:

  1. That all sounds a little too rosy. Must be the Indiana water.

    The payroll increases were in a large part due to hiring low paying temporary people for Christmas retail staff...this happens every year with a little more or less depending on the attitude of the retailers. This year the retailers believed that if they discounted below their cost that people would fight to buy their products...and they did. But the money they used was out of savings or from credit in excess of what the consumer earns in many cases. The retailers will be hard pressed to show good earnings unless they cook the books. When the buying binge is over the hangover will begin.

    Yes our economy is on the mend but the core problems have not been solved so recovery could run into the next recession...which tends to occur every 6 to 7 years unless there is an external trigger...did somebody mention Europe? Global economies with inter-wound banks? Government interference from two polarized political philosophies? 40% of the homes where mortgages are being paid that have negative equity? Mismatch between job seekers and job opportunities? Finally the inability to compromise at the leadership level with no real leader coming out to the Republican party..yet?

    We did not reach this part of the stream just before the waterfall overnight. It took 25 years of hard work where none of our leaders were watching the road very well so we took a few ..maybe a lot of wrong turns. Of course we are responsible for our leaders and need to throw them out of office if they do not do their jobs...but what if there is no choice.

    I do not mean to be so negative but these problems...all of them need to be resolved before we are going to see a return to a decent economy for all peoples. I do not see that happening. What I see is one party hoping we will fail so they can win and the other party believing falsely that throwing government funds at infrastructure issues will be the magic wand that solves the unemployment problem.

    Neither are right. I would never had said this 5 years ago but maybe we need to do what Italy and Argentina did. Bring in some technocrats to solve the problems and then turn the government back over to newly elected politicians.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Since you are not running for public office, we most definitely are not interested in your sex life, especially with Herman Cain. However, if you do decide to run for office, we will plaster your sexcapades all over the WSJ, the Drudge Report, and Grit not to mention Boy Scout Weekly and National Geographic.

    Compromise is good and a concept the Founding Fathers intended us to employ often in our government. Howsomever, to the left, the word means "to agree totally with my side and forget that you ever had an opinion much less a brain." To the right, it means "to totally agree with me or I'll pull out my .45 ACP and fill you full of hot, hollow-point lead." It has a similar meaning as "bipartisanship" as defined by Nancy Pelosi. It's quite like a fight between Rodan and Godzilla...nobody wins, and Tokyo, ie the US, gets obliterated. As admirable as they are, nobody wants to act like the Dutch. Who really wants to go around sticking their thumbs in dikes....watch it!....skating on thin ice, living in windmills, and wearing wooden Weejuns. Besides, we can't even pronounce their words. Expecting the French and Germans to agree on anything is like expecting peace to break out between the Israelis and Arabs this afternoon. It'll be a cold day in Amsterdam when you can't smell the "weed" in the air.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear LSD. There has been much jawboning and (caged) monkeying-around regarding solutions to the financial and housing crises. Yawn, yawn – and that solutions to them are the key to getting the economy going. Banks don’t want to write down principal and banks don’t want to lend unless the borrower has bowkoo net worth . . . . or really doesn’t need credit anyway. As JB or Al have said, it’s the old Mexicano standoff. I don’t want to see debt forgiven at the expense of forsaking a contractual requirement. One solution I’ve read is that banks could loosen repayment terms, lower rates, and take a piece of the profit if/when the underwater house sells, if ever. But this only slightly helps home owners who are not seriously delinquent and/or capable of repaying their mortgages. This is the best “creative” “compromise” I’ve seen yet, yet it doesn’t even come close to getting the acid stuff off banks’ balance sheets and lowering the “house for (short) sale” inventory such that housing could kick itself start. I am simpatico to your plea for “creative solution, compromise” . . . a swig of your expensive Xmas bourbon would only slightly increase my sympathy . . . but I believe that even if such a “deal” could wind up under the U.S. Christmas tree it would not say “From Santa”; it would say “Gratis from the U.S. income tax-PAYING taxpayer.” Nope, been there and done that . . . no mas!

    Ah, the financial situation. More yawn, yawn . . . hey, getting very sleepy here. Hm-m-m-m, let’s see the U.S. Christmas list: Ds want the rich to play Santa so the recumbent D pols can play elfs by spreading all of Santa’s hard-earned cookies (er . . . I mean taxpayers’ $$$) around to all the needy families. Hey, isn’t that the old Xmas spirit . . . hm-m-m-m-m, back to your expensive bourbon. Rs, on the other hand, don’t want to pass around cookies. Rather, they want to put well-balanced, high-protein/less fat menus and TV dinners under the U.S. Christmas tree that would produce smaller waistlines and some belt-tightening so that Pete could do that 7.5 minute mile.

    Too much of a philosophical chasm.

    Unfortunately, and here I go again, nutt’n is gonna happen til Nov. ’12. Bah! Humbug!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Al, Charles, and James,

    Guys guys guys. First, give me credit because this one was shorter. Second, I was not trying to say the economy was healed. I used the good news of the employment number to underscore the point that the politics might have changed somewhat. I know how divided the Ds and Rs are as well as the Europeans. But it seems to me that the right compromise -- if it had some good policy in it -- could help those yokels get elected. So long as the economy sucks, they lose little by pointing fingers. But if we have a somewhat firmer economy a little dose of better policy could actually make them look like winners. Again, I am not saying this compromise would solve our problems and it would not restore strong growth. But it could create another year of growth in output and employment. If they do not compromise and they do nothing then I think all of us are going to be very unhappy next year. Things can get worse and they probably will. Kapish?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I got it but I would rather we look at the panic button ahead of time and get rid of those self serving people and replace them temporarily with some technocrats.

    Heck, one of the R's (senator from West Miami -Rubio) has only been in office for 1 year and is now writing a memoir on himself. "How I did nothing for 1 year and got paid...10 ways to stay in office". It is an American do it yourself book. Meanwhile back at the ranch the emerging countries are laughing at us and getting a game plan together to be #1. Shoot we just gave the Iranians a drone to pour themselves over, sell to the Chinese and I would expect the plans are already published on Iranian and Chinese versions of Facebook.

    On a more sober note, I really want our politicians to face our reality not theirs. Dr D is correct if something is not done...if there is no real movement to compromise and common sense then like the the fella said "we are in deep shit".

    ReplyDelete
  6. James,

    I am sick of those bozos too but if they do nothing in the coming year and the bond vigilantes turn on us, you might be wishing they had done a little more. While the technocrat story sounds good, I am not sure how it would work in our two-party system. It could take a real crisis for US voters to find real technocrats they could vote for. We can only hope that a centrist group will form in both parties...and even that might take a crisis to create. Please do not mention sobriety in this blog. Deep shit is okay but let's not spread rumors of sobriety! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. "The squeaky wheel gets the grease." And the "squeaky wheel" in politics is usually at one extreme or the other. The folks in the center never get heard. As was noted by Ms. P herself when the centrists Ds lost in 2010, the center of the D party in the House moved decidedly left as did their definition of "compromise." It's OK to "hope," but false hope based on unreality gets us nowhere. I harbor no false, "feel-good" hope that the very people we continue to elect will ever compromise with the opposing party much less with people in their own party.....does that make sense?....Our Congress has become impotent....can it borrow your pump, Lar?..., the Supreme Beings have assumed the legislative role, and the Office of the Prez has assumed powers that never existed through executive fiat.

    We're in deep do do, still sinking, and the bottom isn't in sight yet.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Al,

    I don't think I was being unrealistic or too hopeful when I said that it might take a crisis to create a more technocratic approach in the US. I agree that we have become much too dominated by the extremes but keep in mind that the extremes have not always ruled our government. Clinton and Bush 1 might be examples of centrists having more sway. So it isn't impossible to think of the US government as being less extreme. But I admit that it is not easy to see how we will move from today to a more centrist tomorrow.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Google Americas Elect and you will find the leverage for a centrist movement that makes sense. Answer the questions and compare your answer against the 7 million others. It is amazing how the centrist think (on either side of the aisle) the same and those thoughts make absolute sense but do not favor any particular ideas ...right or left. Then look at the governments emerging after the Arab Spring. The right wants to go back to the dark ages and the left want to liberalize the country to be more like our most conservative people. That is liberal to them. So being right or left extreme is mostly graded as extreme depending in what country you are in.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Read it. Took the test. I'm just slightly to the left of Attila the Hun.

    ReplyDelete