Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Don't Destroy What Makes America Great by Guest Blogger John Manzella*

When I crossed through Checkpoint Charlie from West Berlin to East Berlin nearly 30 years ago, the failures of former East Germany were immediately obvious. The grey unkempt landscape and dilapidated buildings looked as though that country hadn't been repaired since American and Soviet tanks faced off yards apart decades earlier in one of the most tense nuclear showdowns.

While there, I witnessed the dismantling of the Berlin Wall and observed the first free parliamentary elections held in that region since 1933. Although these historic events marked the end of Soviet-dominated Communism, that system began collapsing several years earlier.

Michael Novak, the author of dozens of books on the philosophy and theology of culture, stressed that checks and balances are to the political order what competition is to capitalism. The former Soviet Union, East Germany and other Soviet-controlled countries did not have a system of checks and balances or real competition, and failed miserably.

Even today, China has not designed a system with these critical functions. Consequently, its brand of one-party capitalism is undergoing difficulties that are likely to become more severe in the years ahead.

The American system of checks and balances is part of a critically important formula that prevents any one group from permanently imposing its will on others. It shepherds constant changes — some good, some bad — but always allows for self correction.

Combined with American free-market capitalism, which promotes dynamic and healthy competition, as well as a brilliant Constitution, the rule of law, and separation of church and state, these factors have improved the lives of millions of people. They also have attracted the world’s brightest entrepreneurs, engineers and scientists, and empowered people to unleash their creativity, take risks, and start new businesses.

But to continue to succeed, this American experiment also requires trust in important American institutions, like good government, a well functioning electoral system, a fair judiciary, and sound property rights that protect investments. And herein lies a big problem: faith in many American institutions is declining, especially in government.

Stated in a recent report by the Pew Research Center, “Long running surveys show that public confidence in the government fell precipitously in the 1960s and ‘70s, recovered somewhat in the ‘80s and early 2000s, and is near historic lows today.” The report also indicates that only 37% of those interviewed have at least a “fair amount” of confidence in elected officials to act in the best interests of the public, and 63% have “not too much” or “no confidence at all.”

According to the report, “Why Institutions Matter for Economic Growth,” published by the World Economic Forum, a Geneva-based non-profit organization best known for its annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, institutions play an important role in a country’s economic health. When trust declines, economies can fail.

A country’s institutions, sometimes referred to as rules of the game, shape behavior. If, for example, citizens don’t believe the legal system will protect their farm or company from being stolen, then their incentive to work hard and invest in a farm or company will be limited.

Only 25 miles apart, there are many differences between San Diego and Tijuana, Mexico. One has a relatively high standard of living, the other doesn’t. One big factor is the strength and level of trust in the institutions they operate under. For a simpler example, look no further than North and South Korea. One country has a vibrant economy, the other can barely feed its people. One has relatively strong institutions, the other doesn’t.

How do we reverse the decline in trust in our institutions? The answer isn’t simple. But support for American institutions — not today’s constant assault on our electoral system, the independent judiciary, the rule of law, and the media — would help. Although the erosion in trust began years ago, it needs to be addressed before the damage mounts.

Many Americans say they are happy with the performance of their stock portfolios and the U.S. economy. But keep in mind that declining trust in American institutions is tantamount to chipping away at the building blocks that make America great and support our wealth creation model. And for me, this brings images of Berliners chipping away at the Berlin Wall.

*John Manzella, founder of the ManzellaReport.com, is a speaker, author and nationally syndicated columnist on global business and economic trends. Contact him at JohnManzella.com.

This article was nationally syndicated by Tribune News Service.

6 comments:

  1. Have to think that horse is out of the barn. Look at how many big time pols were basically broke when they first got elected and ended up very rich. Not to mention how the perks pols get while in office. Or how many huge multi nationals pay zero or no taxes. No one doubts the justice system is different for the rich and poor. Sad to say these issues are really only the tip of the iceberg. Combined with how polarized the country is and the massive distrust of supporters of opposing pols I don't see much to be optimistic about. But maybe I just need some more Jack in the Black.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I find that the Jack ALWAYS helps. :-)
      My only other comment is that you might want to think about a more balanced data set. It is true that there is much wrong in this country. I am very worried about the polarization of the population. But at the same time I have lived through many challenging times with seemingly intractable problems. There is much good in this country and sometimes it doesn't hurt to try to list those things as you also ponder all the tough problems. Hmmm, now where did that Jack go?

      Delete
    2. I agree there is lots of good. Problem is that not everyone agrees on the definition of good and the subset of what everyone agrees is good seems to be getting smaller as time passes. I can remember when I was at Gables my Dad belonged to a book of the month club and got a book titled "The Worldly Philosophers" which was kinda of a survey of the great economists. While reading this book I came across the term 'the dismal science' used to describe economics; something that has stuck with me to this day. Also remembering my Dad saying he did not want me to read any more books about economics since they depressed me so much. Also remember seeing lots of advice about forbidding a kid to do something only makes them want to do it more.

      Delete
  2. Hey, John. I agree the assaults you cite on our institutions need to be addressed . . . . but with a caveat. The media has shifted way-y-y-y-y left and is complicit in the assaults on the other institutions. Members of the media are products of years of indoctrination in K-12 thru higher edukation by teachers/profs/leaders sympathetic to rewriting history, weakening traditional values of self-reliance, the family unit, respect for authority, free speech, and free markets—stuff that made ‘merika great. Yes, the answer is not simple—it’d take a tsunami of recokition and acknowledgment that the root causz as you say began ‘yearz ago’ but with edukation. Want to restore trust in our institutions? Restore traditional core values and teaching in K-12 thru higher edukation. Unfortunately many of us feel the damage has mounted past the tipping point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I must respectfully disagree with Tuna. The media has not shifted way-y-y-y-y left and it is not complicit. Instead it is the right that has shifted, but it is only from that perspective that the media appears to have shifted

      Delete
    2. Thanks Anonymous, I'm always disappointed that people with your viewpoint hardly ever comment on the blog. So thanks for bringing your perspective. I am sure Tuna will have something to say to you. My first reaction is how would someone bring data to the hypothesis? How would we measure or know whether the media has moved more leftward? Can we "prove" who is right?

      Delete