Tuesday, December 31, 2019

Healthcare 2020 in America by guest blogger Bruce Gingles of Cook Medical

Here’s a macro thought as we prepare to turn out the lights on 2019.  High healthcare spending is vexing many economists and hospitals.  Mature wisdom has suggested that enormous prosperity enjoyed by developed countries following the industrial revolution and later the Information Age, resulted in big piles of cash that could be spent on sick people.  Delivery of expensive medical interventions has increased quantity (and quality) of life by 30 extra years since 1900 (1).  As remarkable, life expectancy in the US has increased a full decade since 1950, years and in some cases even generations after the discovery/implementation of vaccination, penicillin, x-ray, public sanitation and apothecary-quality Jack Daniels (2).

In our justified pride for extending life, we should remember the other side of the wealth-health equation.  Nearly as important as the extra life gained from spending innovation dollars may be the enormous increase in wealth that resulted from living longer.  With the exception of Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, LaBron James and a few European soccer stars, most wealth is owned by old people and for one very practical reason: compound interest and ROI (rate of return on investment).  It takes a long time for a $100 sitting in an index fund or savings account to grow to $1B but because we are living to archeological ages, we can be patient.  Average life expectancy for males in the US in 1900 was about 47 years (1).  That’s not much time to build a fortune considering we don’t walk for a full year and grad school can eat up 10% of the total. We now have almost too many billionaires to count and not just in China.  

Back to healthcare, people are beginning to complain that hospital and CVS bills now consume 18% of GDP.  America’s health bill in 2018 was $3T (yes, trillion) (3).  Even if that seems like a lot, imagine a country being able to fork over that amount and still be under 20% of GDP.  The US can and does spend more each year on healthcare than the total GDP of Great Britain, France, Italy or Brazil. (4)

Let’s raise our glass to the capital appreciation Americans will enjoy in 2020 just by making it to the end of the year.   It’s nice to know that almost a fifth of the total will support continued exploration, validation and adoption of new cures and therapies, and contribute to a virtuous wealth and health cycle.  Space prevents examining the “America spends the most for only average health outcomes” red herring which always seems to follow conversations about healthcare costs.

Bruce Gingles is vice-president of Healthcare Policy and a 40 year employee of Cook Medical.  






4 comments:

  1. Professor Doober: Your guest blogger forgot to say that (1) life expectancy is now dropping in the US; (2) the US medical system does very poorly in quality metrics compared to other countries; and (3) the US medical system is, by far, more expensive than other countries

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks J. I can't speak for him but I can say that his goal might be to not repeat what many have said many times but to shine a different light on that system. Perhaps he is saying that the situation is not all bad. Some folks would throw out the baby with the dirty bath water. One should recognize that the baby has value too. I think he does us a service by completing a partial picture.

      Delete
    2. Professor Doober: I would agree, as long as folks do not see the American health care system as a panacea. At the risk of generalizing: the left think it is all bad while the right thinks it is wonderful. Clearly we are somewhere in between. Your guest blogger did not make note of that.

      J. (and good guess as to my identity LOL)

      Delete
    3. As a writer yourself yoo understand that not every message has to be a full treatise on a topic. He has the right to focus on one aspect -- one aspect that he thinks might be under-understood. I think he did a great job of that. As you know when it comes to academic journals, they are always looking for that one kernal of new information.

      Delete